Segment
1. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Premium2. Michelin Pilot Sport 5 Premium
Comparison: Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 vs. Michelin Pilot Sport 5
Table of contents:
| # | Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 | Michelin Pilot Sport 5 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R22 | R17 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Today, we are comparing two highly rated tyres: the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 and the Michelin Pilot Sport 5. Let's see how these two match up in our tests.
The Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 is a summer tyre known for its premium features. It ranked high in wet braking performance. However, it showed slower steering response, felt more like a comfort bias tyre, and had one of the lowest aquaplaning resistances on test. While it was rated at 82% in our tests, it was used as original equipment in high-end cars like Audi Q8, Audi SQ8, Porsche Cayenne, and BMW X3.
On the other hand, the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 is the successor to the popular Pilot Sport 4 and Pilot Sport 3 models. Noteworthy for its long tread life, this tyre offers good steering, and a progressive understeer balance making it a reliable performer across various conditions. Although it was found to be the priciest among the ones tested and could do with more grip in wet conditions. Despite those minor issues, it thoroughly impressed us by obtaining a 99% rating in our tests.
In the TyreReviews 2023 test, Michelin Pilot Sport 5 was praised for its durability and eco-friendliness, and performed quite well in dry handling, wear, and aquaplaning performance. The Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 received positive comments for its excellent value for money and its commendable wet grip.
The ACE test saw the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 taking the 3rd position, 4 spots ahead of the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127, which held the 7th position. Additionally, in the Autobild sports tyre test including 50 tyres, the Hankook scored a surprising win, while the Michelin was promptly positioned at the 6th place.
In conclusion, the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 offers good value for money with its excellent wet grip whilst Michelin Pilot Sport 5 stands out in durability and performance over various conditions. However, each has its own strengths and weaknesses. While the Hankook could work on its aquaplaning resistance, the Michelin would become an even better tyre with more wet grip and a tad bit less on the price. Both are solid tyre choices for summer use, but your final selection should align with your specific driving style and preferences.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Exemplary2. Michelin Pilot Sport 5 Test winner
Worst rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
Dry braking
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | ||||||
| Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Rating: Recommended | 1 | ||||||
| Michelin Pilot Sport 5 Rating: Highly recommended | 1 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 71 | 54 | 19 | 7 | |||
| Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Rating: Highly recommended | 62 | 50 | 17 | 6 | |||
| Michelin Pilot Sport 5 Rating: Highly recommended | 70 | 50 | 18 | 5 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | |||||
| Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Rating: Good | 2+ | 2 | |||||
| Michelin Pilot Sport 5 Rating: Outstanding | 2+ | 2+ | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Rating: Satisfactory | 2+ | 2+ | 3+ | ||||
| Michelin Pilot Sport 5 Rating: Outstanding | 2+ | 2+ | 1- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 58.1 | 24.8 | |||||
| Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 | 58.1 | 24.8 | |||||
| Michelin Pilot Sport 5 | 60.1 | 26 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | ||||||
| Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Rating: Recommended | 1 | ||||||
| Michelin Pilot Sport 5 Rating: Test winner | 1 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||