In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Singapore (GT) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Kumho winter tyres are slightly better rated (63%) than GT (50%). In this particular case, the GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo has a better rating of 61% compared to 55% of the Kumho WinterCraft WP52. The first tyre test of GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo was done in 2024, compared to 2022 when was the Kumho WinterCraft WP52 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the Radial Winter Pro 2 evo and the WinterCraft WP52 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s) with detailed performance data. This page shows you a comprehensive comparison based on actual head-to-head test results instead of general rankings.
You can explore discipline-by-discipline comparisons, view the spider chart, check price differences, and see which tests were used for this analysis. Or view the general comparison →
Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results
| Organization | Season | Year | Dimension | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AUTOBILD
|
Winter
|
2024 | 205/55 R16 | View |
GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.
Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.