• 18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 vs. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 vs. Pirelli P ZERO vs. Nokian WetProof vs. Falken Azenis FK510

# GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
/0%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
/0%
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127
/75%
Pirelli P ZERO
/0%
Nokian WetProof
/59%
Falken Azenis FK510
/0%

Add to comparison

GoodYear
Michelin
Hankook
Pirelli
Nokian
Falken
DimensionsR17 - R22 R16 - R21 R17 - R22 R17 - R22 R14 - R20 R17 - R22
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparisonRemove from comparisonRemove from comparisonRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

When it comes to high-performance summer tyres, the GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 and Michelin Pilot Sport 4 are two popular choices, both providing compelling performance on both wet and dry roads. In this comparison, we will evaluate their strengths and weaknesses based on various tyre tests and provide a verdict on their overall performance.


The GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 is a successor to the GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3, featuring the same 94% rating in our reviews. Manufactured in Slovenia and Germany, it is a summer tyre suitable for a wide range of vehicle types. Meanwhile, the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 replaces the Michelin Pilot Sport 3, with a likewise 94% rating and manufacturing bases in Spain and Germany. Both tyres have now been succeeded by newer models, with the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 and Michelin Pilot Sport 5 now available.


In mutual tyre tests, the GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 demonstrated strong performance, securing 1st place in both Autozeitung and AutoMotorSport tests out of ten and eleven tyres tested, respectively. Excellent aquaplaning resistance and wet braking qualities were some of the tyre's highlighted strengths. On the other hand, the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 attained 4th and 2nd positions in the same tests, highlighting its dry braking capabilities and performances in various wet handling tests.


In the extensive Autobild test involving 53 tyre models, the GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 once again claimed 1st place, with its price-value ratio, wet handling, aquaplaning resistance, and mileage earning commendations. The Michelin Pilot Sport 4 achieved a commendable 2nd place, showcasing strengths in aquaplaning resistance, dry braking and wet handling. The ADAC test saw the GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 placed 3rd, while the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 secured 2nd place, both achieving recognition for their impressive mileage and dry braking performance.


After examining test results from various sources, it is evident that both the GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 and Michelin Pilot Sport 4 deliver exceptional performance, with strengths in wet handling, aquaplaning resistance, and mileage. While the GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 holds a slight edge in overall test positioning, both models offer strong handling and braking performances, showcasing their respective manufacturers' commitment to excellence. Visit Goodyear and Michelin for more information on their summer tyre offerings.

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 9 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

9

Mutual tests

Autozeitung
Name Points totalWetDry
Best values in test929393
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Rating: Test winner
92 93 92
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
Rating: Highly recommended
878392
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127786987
Falken Azenis FK510
Rating: Highly recommended
868983
Show test details
AutoMotorSport
Name WetDryRolling resistanceNoiseComfort
Best values in test9,49,3101010
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Rating: Very good
9,4 9,2610 10
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
Rating: Very good
9,19,3 789
Pirelli P ZERO
Rating: Very good
8,28,5689
Falken Azenis FK510
Rating: Good
6,77,6777
Show test details
Autobild
Name WetDryRunning costs
Best values in test11-1
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Rating: Exemplary
1-2+1
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
Rating: Exemplary
1-1- 2-
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127
Rating: Satisfactory
2+2+3+
Falken Azenis FK510
Rating: Exemplary
221-
Show test details
Autobild
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test32,128,7
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 533,230,8
Michelin Pilot Sport 432,1 29,8
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K12734,730,3
Pirelli P ZERO34,834,6
Falken Azenis FK5103630,7
Show test details
ADAC
Name WetDryNoiseWearFuel consumption
Best values in test1,71,32,82,01,6
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Rating: Good
2,31,73,12,0 1,9
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
Rating: Good
2,01,92,92,0 1,9
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127
Rating: Satisfactory
3,12,03,42,51,8
Pirelli P ZERO
Rating: Satisfactory
1,81,3 2,93,02,7
Falken Azenis FK510
Rating: Satisfactory
2,42,93,02,0 2,0
Show test details
Autobild
Name WetDryRunning costs
Best values in test111
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Rating: Exemplary
1-2+1
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
Rating: Exemplary
1 1 1-
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127
Rating: Exemplary
2+1-2
Pirelli P ZERO
Rating: Good
1-2+3+
Nokian WetProof
Rating: Good
2+2+2
Falken Azenis FK510
Rating: Exemplary
1-2+2
Show test details
Autobild
Name WetDry
Best values in test1-1-
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Rating: Exemplary
1- 2+
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
Rating: Exemplary
22+
Pirelli P ZERO
Rating: Exemplary
1- 1-
Show test details
Autobild
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test34,228,7
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 534,728,8
Michelin Pilot Sport 434,2 29,6
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K12735,228,7
Pirelli P ZERO35,128,9
Nokian WetProof35,229,7
Falken Azenis FK5103629
Show test details
Tyre Reviews
Name
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Rating: Test winner
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
Rating: Test winner
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127
Rating: Recommended
Falken Azenis FK510
Rating: Recommended
Show test details