Segment
1. Vredestein ULTRAC Premium2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Upper-middle3. Toyo Proxes Comfort Upper-middle4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Upper-middle5. Goodride ZuperEco Z-107 Lowcost
Comparison: Goodride ZuperEco Z-107 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Vredestein ULTRAC vs. Toyo Proxes Comfort vs. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.673. Vredestein ULTRAC 7.25
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Exemplary2. Vredestein ULTRAC Highly recommended4. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good2. Toyo Proxes Comfort Satisfactory3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Still recommended4. Vredestein ULTRAC Sufficient
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,4 | 25,8 | |||||
| Goodride ZuperEco Z-107 | 37,6 | 30,5 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 | 35,4 | 26,1 | |||||
| Vredestein ULTRAC | 36,1 | 26,6 | |||||
| Toyo Proxes Comfort | 36,7 | 27,5 | |||||
| Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun | 36,5 | 28,0 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
