Segment
1. Continental PremiumContact 7 Premium2. Vredestein ULTRAC Premium3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Upper-middle4. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Upper-middle5. Goodride ZuperEco Z-107 Lowcost6. Maxxis Premitra HP5 Lowcost
Comparison: Goodride ZuperEco Z-107 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Vredestein ULTRAC vs. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun vs. Maxxis Premitra HP5
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.674. Vredestein ULTRAC 7.25
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Exemplary2. Vredestein ULTRAC Highly recommended3. Continental PremiumContact 7 Test winner4. Maxxis Premitra HP5 Very good5. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good
Worst rating in test
2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good3. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun Still recommended4. Maxxis Premitra HP5 Conditionally recommended5. Vredestein ULTRAC Sufficient
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,4 | 25,8 | |||||
| Goodride ZuperEco Z-107 | 37,6 | 30,5 | |||||
| Continental PremiumContact 7 | 35,4 | 25,8 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 | 35,4 | 26,1 | |||||
| Vredestein ULTRAC | 36,1 | 26,6 | |||||
| Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun | 36,5 | 28,0 | |||||
| Maxxis Premitra HP5 | 36,2 | 28,4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
