12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Giti Gitiwinter W2 vs. Viking WinTech vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 vs. Kleber Quadraxer 3 vs. Avon ZV7 vs. Nexen N blue HD Plus vs. Laufenn i*Fit + LW31

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Giti Gitiwinter W2 /59%	Viking WinTech /53%	Kumho WinterCraft WP52 /55%	Kleber Quadraxer 3 /79%	Avon ZV7 /17%	Nexen N blue HD Plus /0%	Laufenn i*Fit + LW31 /3%

Dimensions	R14 - R21	R13 - R20	R0 - R21	R14 - R20	R13 - R21	R13 - R22	R13 - R19
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle

2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Upper-middle

3. Giti Gitiwinter W2 Lowcost

4. Viking WinTech Lowcost

5. Avon ZV7 Lowcost

6. Nexen N blue HD Plus Lowcost

7. Laufenn i*Fit + LW31 Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Nexen N blue HD Plus 430

2. Avon ZV7 278

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 192

4. Kleber Quadraxer 3 111

5. Viking WinTech 53

6. Giti Gitiwinter W2 42

7. Laufenn i*Fit + LW31 34

Number of tests

1. Giti Gitiwinter W2 13x

2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 13x

3. Avon ZV7 11x

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 10x

5. Nexen N blue HD Plus 10x

6. Viking WinTech 6x

7. Laufenn i*Fit + LW31 1x

Best position in test

1. Nexen N blue HD Plus 1.

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 2.

3. Kleber Quadraxer 3 4.

4. Giti Gitiwinter W2 7.

5. Avon ZV7 8.

6. Viking WinTech 11.

7. Laufenn i*Fit + LW31 38.

Worst position in test

1. Kleber Quadraxer 3 9.

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 25.

3. Giti Gitiwinter W2 28.

4. Nexen N blue HD Plus 31.

5. Laufenn i*Fit + LW31 38.

6. Viking WinTech 41.

7. Avon ZV7 42.

Average position in tests

1. Kleber Quadraxer 3 6.31

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 12.2

3. Nexen N blue HD Plus 13.6

4. Giti Gitiwinter W2 13.77

5. Avon ZV7 18.55

6. Viking WinTech 20.83

7. Laufenn i*Fit + LW31 38

Year of the last test

1. Giti Gitiwinter W2 2025

2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 2025

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 2024

4. Laufenn i*Fit + LW31 2024

5. Viking WinTech 2024

6. Avon ZV7 2023

7. Nexen N blue HD Plus 2019

Best rating in test

1. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Highly recommended

2. Giti Gitiwinter W2 Good

3. Viking WinTech Recommended

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Satisfactory

5. Nexen N blue HD Plus Satisfactory

6. Avon ZV7 Satisfactory

7. Laufenn i*Fit + LW31 ?

Worst rating in test

1. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Good

2. Viking WinTech Conditionally recommended

3. Avon ZV7 Sufficient

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Sufficient

5. Giti Gitiwinter W2 Sufficient

6. Nexen N blue HD Plus Weak

7. Laufenn i*Fit + LW31 ?

Wet

(Overall rating)

Avon
ZV7

75.6%

Kleber
Quadraxer 3

72.3%

Giti
Giti
winter W2

65%

Nexen
N blue HD Plus

62.6%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52

57%

Viking
WinTech

52%

Laufenn
i*Fit + LW31

?

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 B

2. Laufenn i*Fit + LW31 C

3. Avon ZV7 ?

4. Kleber Quadraxer 3 ?

5. Giti Gitiwinter W2 ?

6. Nexen N blue HD Plus ?

7. Viking WinTech ?

Snow

(Overall rating)

Kleber
Quadraxer 3

81.5%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52

66%

Viking
WinTech

52%

Giti
Giti
winter W2

46%

Laufenn
i*Fit + LW31

?

Avon
ZV7

?

Nexen
N blue HD Plus

?

Dry

(Overall rating)

Avon
ZV7

78.8%

Kleber
Quadraxer 3

76.6%

Nexen
N blue HD Plus

69%

Giti
Giti
winter W2

61%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52

55%

Viking
WinTech

48%

Laufenn
i*Fit + LW31

?

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Avon
ZV7

82.3%

Nexen
N blue HD Plus

76.6%

Kleber
Quadraxer 3

66.2%

Giti
Giti
winter W2

63%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52

52%

Viking
WinTech

46%

Laufenn
i*Fit + LW31

?

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Avon ZV7 ?

2. Nexen N blue HD Plus ?

3. Kleber Quadraxer 3 ?

4. Giti Gitiwinter W2 ?

5. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 ?

6. Viking WinTech ?

7. Laufenn i*Fit + LW31 ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Kleber
Quadraxer 3

70.8%

Viking
WinTech

69%

Avon
ZV7

58.7%

Nexen
N blue HD Plus

57.3%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52

51%

Giti
Giti
winter W2

41%

Laufenn
i*Fit + LW31

?

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 C

2. Laufenn i*Fit + LW31 D

3. Kleber Quadraxer 3 ?

4. Viking WinTech ?

5. Avon ZV7 ?

6. Nexen N blue HD Plus ?

7. Giti Gitiwinter W2 ?

Offroad

(Overall rating)

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52

74%

Giti
Giti
winter W2

72%

Kleber
Quadraxer 3

0%

Viking
WinTech

0%

Avon
ZV7

0%

Nexen
N blue HD Plus

0%

Laufenn
i*Fit + LW31

?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Viking
WinTech

84%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52

0%

Giti
Giti
winter W2

0%

Kleber
Quadraxer 3

?

Avon
ZV7

?

Nexen
N blue HD Plus

?

Laufenn
i*Fit + LW31

?

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

ADAC Winter tyre test 2024 215/55 R17

Name	Winter	Wet	Dry	Enviromental impact	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	1.7	2.1	2.2	1.7	2.7	1.6	1.3
Giti GitiWinter W2 Rating: Satisfactory	2.5	2.5	3.2	2.9	4.0	2.6	1.6
Viking WinTech Rating: Satisfactory	2.8	2.8	3.6	3.1	4.3	3.0	2.2
Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Rating: Sufficient	2.3	2.6	3.6	2.6	3.9	1.8	1.5
Show test details