Comparison: Giti Gitiwinter W2 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Singapore (Giti) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Giti is a brand that belongs to the GT group. Generally, Kumho winter tyres are slightly better rated (63%) than Giti (59%). In this particular case, the Giti Gitiwinter W2 has a better rating of 59% compared to 55% of the Kumho WinterCraft WP52. The first tyre test of Giti Gitiwinter W2 was done in 2021, compared to 2022 when was the Kumho WinterCraft WP52 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2024 245/45 R18 test, where both the winter W2 and the WinterCraft WP52 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
Great news! We found mutual test data
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s) with detailed performance data. This page shows you a comprehensive comparison based on actual head-to-head test results instead of general rankings.
You can explore discipline-by-discipline comparisons, view the spider chart, check price differences, and see which tests were used for this analysis. Or view the general comparison →
Mutual tests overview
Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results
Performance comparison
Averaged from 3 tests
Giti Gitiwinter W2
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
Giti Gitiwinter W2
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
Giti Gitiwinter W2
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
Giti Gitiwinter W2
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
Giti Gitiwinter W2
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
Giti Gitiwinter W2
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
Giti Gitiwinter W2
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
Giti Gitiwinter W2
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
Giti Gitiwinter W2
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
Giti Gitiwinter W2
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
Performance spider chart
Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.
Dimensions and prices
Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.
