Segment
1. General Altimax Winter 3 Lowcost3. Laufenn i*Fit + LW31 Lowcost4. Barum Polaris 3 Lowcost
Comparison: General Altimax Winter 3 vs. GT Radial Champiro WinterPro 2 vs. Laufenn i*Fit + LW31 vs. Barum Polaris 3
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Barum Polaris 3 10.6
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Barum Polaris 3 Exemplary3. General Altimax Winter 3 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Barum Polaris 3 Satisfactory3. General Altimax Winter 3 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,8 | ||||||
| General Altimax Winter 3 | 38,1 | ||||||
| GT Radial Champiro WinterPro 2 | 37,3 | 26,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,6 | 1,9 | 1,9 | 2,0 | 2,6 | 2,0 | |
| General Altimax Winter 3 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,5 | 3,4 | 1,9 | 2,1 | 2,7 | 2,0 | |
| GT Radial Champiro WinterPro 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,5 | 3,5 | 2,4 | 2,4 | 2,7 | 3,0 | |
| Show test details | |||||||
