Segment
1. Vredestein Wintrac Premium2. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Lowcost
Comparison: Fulda Kristall Montero 3 vs. Vredestein Wintrac
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Fulda) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein). Generally, Vredestein winter tyres are slightly better rated (60%) than Fulda (38%). In this particular case, the Vredestein Wintrac has a better rating of 58% compared to 19% of the Fulda Kristall Montero 3. The first tyre test of Fulda Kristall Montero 3 was done in 2015, compared to 2021 when was the Vredestein Wintrac first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2022 185/65 R15 test, where both the Kristall Montero 3 and the Wintrac were tested.
| # | Fulda Kristall Montero 3
| Vredestein Wintrac
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R16 | R15 - R16 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein Wintrac Very good2. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Sufficient
Worst rating in test
1. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Sufficient2. Vredestein Wintrac Sufficient
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow traction
Snow braking
Snow handling
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry driving behavior
Dry braking
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Ice braking
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Rolling resistance | Noise | Wear |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,7 | 1,9 | 1,8 | 1,9 | 1,7 | 2,5 | 1,5 |
| Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Rating: Sufficient | 3,7 | 3,6 | 1,9 | 2,3 | 2,0 | 2,9 | 1,5 |
| Vredestein Wintrac Rating: Satisfactory | 2,1 | 2,4 | 2,7 | 2,4 | 2,4 | 2,8 | 2,5 |
| Show test details | |||||||
