Segment
1. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Lowcost2. Matador MP93 Nordicca Lowcost
Comparison: Fulda Kristall Montero 3 vs. Matador MP93 Nordicca
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Fulda) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovakia (Matador). Matador is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, Fulda winter tyres are slightly better rated (64%) than Matador (40%). The first tyre test of Fulda Kristall Montero 3 was done in 2015, compared to 2022 when was the Matador MP93 Nordicca first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 87% of Fulda Kristall Montero 3 dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Matador MP93 Nordicca also have C wet ratings.
| # | Fulda Kristall Montero 3
| Matador MP93 Nordicca
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R16 | R13 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Matador MP93 Nordicca 23.75
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Matador MP93 Nordicca Satisfactory2. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Sufficient
Worst rating in test
1. Matador MP93 Nordicca Satisfactory2. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Sufficient
