Segment
1. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Lowcost2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Lowcost
Comparison: Fulda Kristall Montero 3 vs. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Fulda) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovakia (Matador). Matador is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, Fulda winter tyres are slightly better rated (38%) than Matador (33%). Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2015 185/60 R15 test, where both the Kristall Montero 3 and the MP92 Sibir Snow were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 87% of Fulda Kristall Montero 3 dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Matador MP92 Sibir Snow also have C wet ratings.
| # | Fulda Kristall Montero 3
| Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R16 | R15 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory2. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Sufficient
Worst rating in test
1. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory2. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Sufficient
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow braking
Snow handling
Snow traction
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 36,8 | 27,7 | |||||
| Fulda Kristall Montero 3 | 42,8 | 27,7 | |||||
| Matador MP92 Sibir Snow | 43,1 | 28,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
