Segment
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Upper-middle2. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Fulda) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Kumho winter tyres are slightly better rated (61%) than Fulda (38%). Important for this comparison is also the Autozeitung 2015 185/65 R15 test, where both the Kristall Montero 3 and the WinterCraft WP51 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 87% of Fulda Kristall Montero 3 dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (94%) of the Kumho WinterCraft WP51 also have C wet ratings.
# | Fulda Kristall Montero 3
| Kumho WinterCraft WP51
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R13 - R16 | R13 - R17 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Upper-middle2. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Lowcost
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Satisfactory2. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Sufficient
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Sufficient2. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Sufficient
Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Snow | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 415 | 144 | 136 | 144 | |||
Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Rating: - | 317 | 93 | 98 | 126 | |||
Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Rating: - | 338 | 107 | 111 | 120 | |||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 36,8 | 27,7 | |||||
Fulda Kristall Montero 3 | 42,8 | 27,7 | |||||
Kumho WinterCraft WP51 | 42,5 | 30,2 | |||||
Show test details |