Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium2. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Fulda) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (87%) than Fulda (64%). The first tyre test of Fulda Kristall Montero 3 was done in 2015, compared to 2019 when was the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2022 185/65 R15 test, where both the Kristall Montero 3 and the Blizzak LM-005 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 87% of Fulda Kristall Montero 3 has C wet grip rating, whereas 95% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has A rating.
| # | Fulda Kristall Montero 3
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R16 | R14 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium2. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Lowcost
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good2. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Sufficient
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended2. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Sufficient
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Rolling resistance | Noise | Wear |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,7 | 1,9 | 1,8 | 1,9 | 1,7 | 2,5 | 1,5 |
| Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Rating: Sufficient | 3,7 | 3,6 | 1,9 | 2,3 | 2,0 | 2,9 | 1,5 |
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Satisfactory | 1,7 | 2,1 | 2,4 | 2,8 | 1,9 | 2,9 | 3,0 |
| Show test details | |||||||