Segment
1. Michelin ALPIN 6 Premium2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle3. Debica Frigo HP2 Lowcost4. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 Lowcost
Comparison: Debica Frigo HP2 vs. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 vs. Michelin ALPIN 6 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Michelin ALPIN 6 4.354. Debica Frigo HP2 17.33
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin ALPIN 6 Exemplary2. Semperit Speed-Grip 5 Exemplary3. Debica Frigo HP2 Good4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Michelin ALPIN 6 Good3. Debica Frigo HP2 Conditionally recommended4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
3
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.6 | 27.1 | |||||
| Debica Frigo HP2 | 38.1 | 28.6 | |||||
| Semperit Speed-Grip 5 | 34.9 | 29.0 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | |||
| Debica Frigo HP2 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 3+ | 3 | 2+ | 2- | |||
| Semperit Speed-Grip 5 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2- | 2- | 1- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 31,4 | 29,2 | |||||
| Debica Frigo HP2 | 37,0 | 30,1 | |||||
| Semperit Speed-Grip 5 | 35,9 | 31,3 | |||||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52 | 36,9 | 31,4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
