• 12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Vredestein ULTRAC vs. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs. Michelin Primacy 4+ vs. Toyo Proxes Comfort vs. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

Today, we will be comparing synthetic text results of the Continental PremiumContact 7 (manufactured by Continental) with the Vredestein ULTRAC (manufactured by Vredestein), two highly rated summer tyres.


The Continental PremiumContact 7 is a successor of the Continental PremiumContact 6 and the Continental ContiPremiumContact 5. Tested all across Europe, this touring tyre received stellar ratings of 99%. Its strength lies particularly in wet conditions, securing the first position in terms of wet and dry braking and handling in the ACE and Automotorsport tests.


However, there are a few areas for improvement - the Continental PremiumContact 7 registered average resistance to aquaplaning and exhibited slightly increased external noise.


On the other hand, Vredestein ULTRAC, the first equipment for BMW 2-series Active Tourer, did not receive as high a ranking as its counterpart - with an overall rating of 26%. It secured the third position in the Automotorsport test, with strengths in handling and resisting aquaplaning.


The Vredestein ULTRAC showcases some excellent qualities, such as secure handling on wet and dry roads and impressive aquaplaning resistance. However, it falls short when it comes to overall efficiency, with higher rolling resistance and external noise.


When compared head to head in the Autobild and Autozeitung tests, the Continental PremiumContact 7 consistently outperformed Vredestein ULTRAC, securing the first position, while the latter secured the third and fourth position respectively.


Both tyres do have a few drawbacks. While the Continental PremiumContact 7 struggles slightly with aquaplaning and noise, the Vredestein ULTRAC was marked down for its high rolling resistance and noise levels.


In conclusion, while the Continental PremiumContact 7 consistently outperforms the Vredestein ULTRAC in terms of handling and braking – both in wet and dry conditions – the Vredestein ULTRAC does have some strengths. Particularly, it offers very good aquaplaning resistance and handling on wet and dry roads. However, overall, the Continental PremiumContact 7 provides a better balance between efficiency and performance.

Performance comparison

Averaged from 2 tests

Wet Performance
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Vredestein ULTRAC
83%
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
73%
Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Toyo Proxes Comfort
73%
Toyo
Proxes Comfort
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
73%
Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Wet Braking
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Vredestein ULTRAC
76%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
67%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
75%
Wet Handling
Continental PremiumContact 7
83%
Vredestein ULTRAC
78%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
79%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
66%
Wet Circle Cornering
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Vredestein ULTRAC
81%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
73%
Michelin Primacy 4+
77%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
77%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
64%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Vredestein ULTRAC
85%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
71%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
75%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
75%
Best: Vredestein ULTRAC (84.5%)
Aquaplaning Cross
Continental PremiumContact 7
66%
Vredestein ULTRAC
95%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
66%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
66%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
86%
Best in category: Bridgestone Potenza Sport (88.5%)
Dry Performance
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Vredestein ULTRAC
80%
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
80%
Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
Michelin Primacy 4+
81%
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Toyo Proxes Comfort
78%
Toyo
Proxes Comfort
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
82%
Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Dry Braking
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Vredestein ULTRAC
81%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
81%
Michelin Primacy 4+
81%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
81%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
81%
Dry Handling
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Vredestein ULTRAC
78%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
74%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
83%
Best: Kumho Ecsta HS52 (92.0%)
Best in category: Kumho Ecsta HS52 (91.0%)
Comfort & Noise
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Vredestein ULTRAC
76%
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
80%
Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
Michelin Primacy 4+
85%
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Toyo Proxes Comfort
80%
Toyo
Proxes Comfort
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
76%
Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Noise Exterior
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Vredestein ULTRAC
76%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
80%
Michelin Primacy 4+
85%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
80%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
76%
Best in category: Fulda EcoControl HP2 (91.0%)
Economy
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Vredestein ULTRAC
48%
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
70%
Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
Michelin Primacy 4+
85%
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Toyo Proxes Comfort
65%
Toyo
Proxes Comfort
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
70%
Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Rolling Resistance
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%
Vredestein ULTRAC
63%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
80%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
71%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
81%
Mileage
Continental PremiumContact 7
73%
Vredestein ULTRAC
32%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
59%
Michelin Primacy 4+
93%
Toyo Proxes Comfort
59%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
59%
Best in category: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 (86.7%)

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Loading...

Add to comparison