• 12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Vredestein ULTRAC vs. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs. Michelin Primacy 4+ vs. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

The two tyres that are being compared today are the Continental PremiumContact 7 and the Kumho Ecsta HS52, both of which are summer touring tyres.


The Continental PremiumContact 7 is an impressive tyre, consistently ranking first in multiple tests such as Vibilagare, Autobild and ADAC. This is a testament to its quality and credibility in the tyre space. It boasts superior dry braking, wet braking, and wet circle cornering, which makes it a top choice for those in search of a reliable summer tyre. It is made in various European countries including France, Slovakia, Germany, and Czech Republic. It is worth noting that this model replaced the Continental PremiumContact 6 and the Continental ContiPremiumContact 5. Even with a few weaknesses in aquaplaning behaviour and slightly heavier weight as reported in the ADAC 2024 test, there are no reported weaknesses that outshine its overall performance.


On the other hand, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 has garnered a rating of 81% on our site. According to Autobild and ADAC tests, it shows impressive dry handling and wet braking, alongside a commendable mileage and performance on wet circle cornering. However, unlike the Continental tyre, the model was outperformed in some tests (position 13 in Autoklub ČR) and gained some criticism for its relatively average wet grip and slightly uncomfortable rolling noise. But its overall performance is still strong, especially considering its affordable price tag and predicted high mileage. Its being the successor to the Kumho Ecsta HS51 proves that it was a worthy upgrade.


In conclusion, both tyres are excellent summer options for any vehicle. The Continental PremiumContact 7 held its own and consistently ranked first across several tyre tests. It demonstrates unparalleled performance on both wet and dry roads. The Kumho Ecsta HS52, on the other hand, provides a more budget-friendly alternative that doesn't compromise on quality. While it might not have matched Continental's performance in some tests, it offers exceptional dry handling and braking capabilities and was rated particularly well for its mileage.


To learn more about Continental tyres, click here, and for more on Kumho, click here.

Performance comparison

Averaged from 2 tests

Wet Performance
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Vredestein ULTRAC
81%
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
58%
Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
Michelin Primacy 4+
72%
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
71%
Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Wet Braking
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
75%
Vredestein ULTRAC
67%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
61%
Michelin Primacy 4+
70%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
66%
Wet Handling
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Vredestein ULTRAC
69%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
53%
Michelin Primacy 4+
68%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
59%
Wet Circle Cornering
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
88%
Vredestein ULTRAC
78%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
62%
Michelin Primacy 4+
72%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
65%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Continental PremiumContact 7
65%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
65%
Vredestein ULTRAC
94%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
61%
Michelin Primacy 4+
74%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
76%
Best: Vredestein ULTRAC (94.0%)
Aquaplaning Cross
Continental PremiumContact 7
58%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
62%
Vredestein ULTRAC
98%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
55%
Michelin Primacy 4+
74%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
88%
Best in category: Vredestein ULTRAC (80.9%)
Dry Performance
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Kumho Ecsta HS52
86%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Vredestein ULTRAC
82%
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
75%
Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
Michelin Primacy 4+
81%
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
77%
Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Dry Braking
Continental PremiumContact 7
95%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Vredestein ULTRAC
76%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
74%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
78%
Dry Handling
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
93%
Vredestein ULTRAC
87%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
76%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
75%
Comfort & Noise
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Vredestein ULTRAC
74%
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
61%
Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
61%
Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Noise Exterior
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
60%
Vredestein ULTRAC
65%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
68%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
68%
Best: Sailun Atrezzo ZSR 2 (100.0%)
Noise Interior
Continental PremiumContact 7
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Vredestein ULTRAC
82%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
53%
Michelin Primacy 4+
71%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
53%
Best in category: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 (91.0%)
Economy
Continental PremiumContact 7
78%
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Kumho Ecsta HS52
75%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Vredestein ULTRAC
42%
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
74%
Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
Michelin Primacy 4+
83%
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
67%
Falken
ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Rolling Resistance
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
67%
Vredestein ULTRAC
59%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
84%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
75%
Mileage
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
83%
Vredestein ULTRAC
24%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
63%
Michelin Primacy 4+
91%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
59%
Best in category: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 (100.0%)

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Loading...

Add to comparison