• 12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2 vs. Michelin Primacy 4

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Firestone Roadhawk


In this comparison, we will take a closer look at two popular summer tyres - the Continental PremiumContact 6 and the Firestone Roadhawk. We will review their performance based on different tests and give you a verdict on their strengths and weaknesses.


Continental PremiumContact 6


The Continental PremiumContact 6 is a top-quality summer tyre designed for touring. It is manufactured in Slovakia, Germany, and the Czech Republic. This award-winning tyre replaced the Continental ContiPremiumContact 5, offering improved performance and better fuel efficiency. The PremiumContact 6 has been replaced by the Continental PremiumContact 7.


In terms of test results, the Continental PremiumContact 6 has demonstrated impressive performance, earning high ratings on both wet and dry surfaces. In the ADAC and Autozeitung tests, the tyre scored particularly well in wet braking, wet handling, wet circle cornering, and dry steering response. The PremiumContact 6 holds an overall rating of 90% on our website.


Strengths of the Continental PremiumContact 6 include its excellent performance on wet surfaces and high level of driving safety. However, it does have weaknesses in terms of efficiency and fuel consumption.


Firestone Roadhawk


The Firestone Roadhawk is a summer tyre designed for various types of vehicles. Manufactured by Firestone, a reputable brand in the tyre industry, the Roadhawk aims to provide good performance on both wet and dry surfaces.


Test results for the Firestone Roadhawk are mixed. In the ADAC 2020 and Autozeitung tests, the tyre received praise for its performance on dry surfaces, particularly in dry steering response and handling. However, it scored poorly in wet conditions, with particular weaknesses in wet braking and handling. The Roadhawk holds an overall rating of 71% on our website.


Strengths of the Firestone Roadhawk include its handling on dry surfaces and low fuel consumption. However, the tyre has significant weaknesses when it comes to performance on wet surfaces, as well as increased wear and tear.


Comparison Verdict


Based on test results and overall performance, the Continental PremiumContact 6 is a better choice when it comes to wet surface performance and driving safety, while the Firestone Roadhawk may be more suitable for drivers prioritizing dry surface handling and fuel efficiency. Ultimately, the Continental PremiumContact 6 demonstrates a more balanced and reliable performance across various driving conditions, making it the preferable choice for most drivers.

Performance comparison

Averaged from 2 tests

Wet Performance
Continental PremiumContact 6
78%
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Firestone
Roadhawk
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
86%
Pirelli
Cinturato P7 C2
Michelin Primacy 4
72%
Michelin
Primacy 4
Wet Braking
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
96%
Michelin Primacy 4
86%
Wet Handling
Continental PremiumContact 6
86%
Firestone Roadhawk
55%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
84%
Michelin Primacy 4
65%
Best: Falken Azenis FK510 (96.0%)
Wet Circle Cornering
Continental PremiumContact 6
89%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Michelin Primacy 4
78%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Continental PremiumContact 6
62%
Firestone Roadhawk
69%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
76%
Michelin Primacy 4
69%
Best: Kumho Ecsta HS51 (95.0%)
Aquaplaning Cross
Continental PremiumContact 6
59%
Firestone Roadhawk
66%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
87%
Michelin Primacy 4
64%
Best: Kumho Ecsta HS51 (96.0%)
Best in category: Kumho Ecsta HS51 (92.8%)
Dry Performance
Continental PremiumContact 6
76%
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Firestone Roadhawk
86%
Firestone
Roadhawk
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
81%
Pirelli
Cinturato P7 C2
Michelin Primacy 4
72%
Michelin
Primacy 4
Dry Braking
Continental PremiumContact 6
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
80%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
86%
Michelin Primacy 4
85%
Dry Handling
Continental PremiumContact 6
75%
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
75%
Michelin Primacy 4
59%
Best in category: Pirelli Cinturato P7 (94.0%)
Comfort & Noise
Continental PremiumContact 6
69%
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Firestone Roadhawk
68%
Firestone
Roadhawk
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
68%
Pirelli
Cinturato P7 C2
Michelin Primacy 4
77%
Michelin
Primacy 4
Noise Exterior
Continental PremiumContact 6
66%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
71%
Michelin Primacy 4
77%
Best: Kleber Dynaxer HP4 (85.5%)
Noise Interior
Continental PremiumContact 6
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Michelin Primacy 4
71%
Best: Falken Azenis FK510 (89.0%)
Ride Comfort
Continental PremiumContact 6
64%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
64%
Michelin Primacy 4
82%
Best in category: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 (81.0%)
Economy
Continental PremiumContact 6
76%
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Firestone Roadhawk
69%
Firestone
Roadhawk
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
50%
Pirelli
Cinturato P7 C2
Michelin Primacy 4
85%
Michelin
Primacy 4
Rolling Resistance
Continental PremiumContact 6
55%
Firestone Roadhawk
63%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
46%
Michelin Primacy 4
79%
Fuel Efficiency
Continental PremiumContact 6
89%
Firestone Roadhawk
84%
Michelin Primacy 4
84%
Mileage
Continental PremiumContact 6
84%
Firestone Roadhawk
59%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
53%
Michelin Primacy 4
93%
Best in category: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 (94.0%)

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Loading...

Add to comparison