18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Barum Polaris 5 vs. Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 vs. Laufenn I FIT Plus vs. Viking WinTech

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 /82%	Barum Polaris 5 /63%	Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 /86%	Laufenn I FIT Plus /59%	Viking WinTech /53%

Dimensions	R14 - R22	R13 - R19	R17 - R22		R13 - R20
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium

2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 Premium

3. Barum Polaris 5 Lowcost

4. Laufenn I FIT Plus Lowcost

5. Viking WinTech Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 213

2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 93

3. Barum Polaris 5 76

4. Viking WinTech 53

5. Laufenn I FIT Plus 0

Number of tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 49x

2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 18x

3. Barum Polaris 5 13x

4. Laufenn I FIT Plus 6x

5. Viking WinTech 6x

Best position in test

1. Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 1.

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 1.

3. Barum Polaris 5 9.

4. Laufenn I FIT Plus 10.

5. Viking WinTech 11.

Worst position in test

1. Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 14.

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 15.

3. Laufenn I FIT Plus 20.

4. Barum Polaris 5 26.

5. Viking WinTech 41.

Average position in tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 3.2

2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 5.06

3. Laufenn I FIT Plus 14.5

4. Barum Polaris 5 15.15

5. Viking WinTech 20.83

Year of the last test

1. Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 2025

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 2024

3. Viking WinTech 2024

4. Barum Polaris 5 2023

5. Laufenn I FIT Plus 2023

Best rating in test

1. Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 Exemplary

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good

3. Barum Polaris 5 Good

4. Viking WinTech Recommended

5. Laufenn I FIT Plus Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 Good

2. Laufenn I FIT Plus Conditionally recommended

3. Viking WinTech Conditionally recommended

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended

5. Barum Polaris 5 Sufficient

Snow

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

81%

Laufenn
I FIT Plus

80%

Hankook
Winter i*cept evo3 W330

77%

Barum
Polaris 5

76%

Viking
WinTech

69%

Snow braking

1. Barum Polaris 5 81%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 79%

3. Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 76%

4. Laufenn I FIT Plus 74%

5. Viking WinTech 66%

Snow traction

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 82%

2. Viking WinTech 76%

3. Laufenn I FIT Plus 76%

4. Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 75%

5. Barum Polaris 5 75%

Snow handling

1. Laufenn I FIT Plus 86%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 78%

3. Barum Polaris 5 76%

4. Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 75%

5. Viking WinTech 0%

Snow cornering

1. Laufenn I FIT Plus 84%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 83%

3. Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 82%

4. Barum Polaris 5 71%

5. Viking WinTech 65%

Dry

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

80%

Hankook
Winter i*cept evo3 W330

80%

Laufenn
I FIT Plus

71%

Viking
WinTech

68%

Barum
Polaris 5

62%

Dry braking

1. Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 77%

2. Laufenn I FIT Plus 75%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 74%

4. Barum Polaris 5 68%

5. Viking WinTech 57%

Dry handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 85%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 84%

3. Viking WinTech 78%

4. Barum Polaris 5 76%

5. Laufenn I FIT Plus 67%

Wet

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

89%

Hankook
Winter i*cept evo3 W330

79%

Barum
Polaris 5

63%

Laufenn
I FIT Plus

58%

Viking
WinTech

54%

Wet braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 95%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 73%

3. Barum Polaris 5 61%

4. Viking WinTech 59%

5. Laufenn I FIT Plus 59%

Wet handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 85%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 78%

3. Laufenn I FIT Plus 60%

4. Barum Polaris 5 55%

5. Viking WinTech 53%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 86%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 84%

3. Barum Polaris 5 67%

4. Laufenn I FIT Plus 60%

5. Viking WinTech 51%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 90%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 89%

3. Barum Polaris 5 63%

4. Laufenn I FIT Plus 51%

5. Viking WinTech 42%

Wet circle cornering

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 90%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 68%

3. Barum Polaris 5 67%

4. Viking WinTech 63%

5. Laufenn I FIT Plus 59%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 A

2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 B

3. Barum Polaris 5 C

4. Viking WinTech ?

5. Laufenn I FIT Plus ?

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Hankook
Winter i*cept evo3 W330

74%

Laufenn
I FIT Plus

73%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

72%

Barum
Polaris 5

70%

Viking
WinTech

67%

Exterior noise

1. Laufenn I FIT Plus 80%

2. Barum Polaris 5 76%

3. Viking WinTech 73%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 74%

5. Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 63%

Comfort

1. Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 81%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 76%

3. Laufenn I FIT Plus 71%

4. Barum Polaris 5 61%

5. Viking WinTech 0%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 ?

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 ?

3. Laufenn I FIT Plus ?

4. Barum Polaris 5 ?

5. Viking WinTech ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Barum
Polaris 5

79%

Laufenn
I FIT Plus

72%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

66%

Hankook
Winter i*cept evo3 W330

64%

Viking
WinTech

61%

Rolling resistance

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 79%

2. Barum Polaris 5 75%

3. Laufenn I FIT Plus 66%

4. Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 59%

5. Viking WinTech 0%

Mileage

1. Barum Polaris 5 73%

2. Laufenn I FIT Plus 64%

3. Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 62%

4. Viking WinTech 61%

5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 60%

Price/value

1. Barum Polaris 5 90%

2. Laufenn I FIT Plus 86%

3. Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 71%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 61%

5. Viking WinTech 0%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 C

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 C

3. Barum Polaris 5 E

4. Laufenn I FIT Plus ?

5. Viking WinTech ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Viking
WinTech

84%

Barum
Polaris 5

82%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

78%

Hankook
Winter i*cept evo3 W330

0%

Laufenn
I FIT Plus

0%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 11 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

ADAC Winter tyre test 2023 205/60 R16

Name	Enviromental impact	Driving safety
Best values in test	2	2.1
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good	3.1	2.1
Barum Polaris 5 Rating: Satisfactory	2.3	3.4
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2023 225/45 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Satisfactory	1-	2	2-	3+
Barum Polaris 5 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2	2+	1-
Hankook Winter icept evo3 W330 Rating: Good*	2+	2	2	3+
Laufenn I FIT Plus Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2-	2+	2-
Viking WinTech Rating: Conditionally recommended	3+	2-	2	2
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2023 225/45 R18

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	31,4	29,2
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	31,4	30,9
Barum Polaris 5	35,6	31,0
Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330	35,2	30,3
Laufenn I FIT Plus	35,1	30,6
Viking WinTech	36,0	31,0
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,8	25,4
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	32,8	26,3
Barum Polaris 5	37,5	26,9
Viking WinTech	37,1	27,1
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2022 185/65 R15

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Rolling resistance	Noise	Wear
Best values in test	1,7	1,9	1,8	1,9	1,7	2,5	1,5
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Satisfactory	1,7	2,1	2,4	2,8	1,9	2,9	3,0
Barum Polaris 5 Rating: Sufficient	3,2	3,9	2,4	2,8	2,0	3,0	2,0
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Wear
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+	1
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good	1-	2	1	2	2+
Barum Polaris 5 Rating: Satisfactory	3+	3+	2+	1-	2+
Laufenn I FIT Plus Rating: Conditionally recommended	3+	2+	1-	2	3+
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2021 195/65 R15

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear
Best values in test	1,6	1,9	1,9	2,0	2,6	2,0
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Satisfactory	1,7	2,5	2,8	2,3	3,3	3,0
Barum Polaris 5 Rating: Satisfactory	3,2	3,0	2,0	2,0	2,8	3,0
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,1	27,3
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	32,1	28,1
Barum Polaris 5	36,1	28,8
Laufenn I FIT Plus	35,2	28,6
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2020 245/45 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	1-	2+	1-
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Exemplary	2+	2+	1-	2
Barum Polaris 5 Rating: Good	2-	2	2	2-
Hankook Winter icept evo3 W330 Rating: Exemplary*	2+	2	2	2
Laufenn I FIT Plus Rating: Satisfactory	3+	2-	2	2+
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2020 245/45 R18

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	30,3	24,3
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	30,3	24,5
Barum Polaris 5	35,2	24,9
Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330	32,3	25
Laufenn I FIT Plus	36,2	24,8
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2019 225/45 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	29,2	24
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	29,2	24,6
Barum Polaris 5	33,9	25
Viking WinTech	35,8	-
Show test details

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Barum Polaris 5 vs. Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 vs. Laufenn I FIT Plus vs. Viking WinTech

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands