Segment
2. Barum Polaris 5 Lowcost3. Laufenn I FIT Plus Lowcost4. Viking WinTech Lowcost
2. Barum Polaris 5 Lowcost3. Laufenn I FIT Plus Lowcost4. Viking WinTech Lowcost
3. Barum Polaris 5 15.154. Viking WinTech 20.83
1. Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 Exemplary2. Barum Polaris 5 Good3. Viking WinTech Recommended4. Laufenn I FIT Plus Satisfactory
2. Laufenn I FIT Plus Conditionally recommended3. Viking WinTech Conditionally recommended4. Barum Polaris 5 Sufficient
These tyres were tested together in 4 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | |||
| Barum Polaris 5 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | 2+ | 1- | |||
| Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 Rating: Good | 2+ | 2 | 2 | 3+ | |||
| Laufenn I FIT Plus Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2- | 2+ | 2- | |||
| Viking WinTech Rating: Conditionally recommended | 3+ | 2- | 2 | 2 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 31,4 | 29,2 | |||||
| Barum Polaris 5 | 35,6 | 31,0 | |||||
| Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 | 35,2 | 30,3 | |||||
| Laufenn I FIT Plus | 35,1 | 30,6 | |||||
| Viking WinTech | 36,0 | 31,0 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 2+ | 1- | |||
| Barum Polaris 5 Rating: Good | 2- | 2 | 2 | 2- | |||
| Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2 | 2 | 2 | |||
| Laufenn I FIT Plus Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2- | 2 | 2+ | |||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 30,3 | 24,3 | |||||
| Barum Polaris 5 | 35,2 | 24,9 | |||||
| Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 | 32,3 | 25 | |||||
| Laufenn I FIT Plus | 36,2 | 24,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||