18 shops, 56 847 products

|

TheTyreLab.com
Vs
Bridgestone Blizzak Lm 001
Fulda Kristall Montero 3

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Fulda Kristall Montero 3

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Fulda). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (87%) than Fulda (64%). But when it comes to comparing Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 and Fulda Kristall Montero 3, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2015 185/60 R15 test, where both the Blizzak LM-001 and the Kristall Montero 3 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 72% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 has B wet grip rating, whereas 87% of Fulda Kristall Montero 3 has C rating. We also know where Blizzak LM-001 is made - Poland.

#	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 /0%	Fulda Kristall Montero 3 /0%	Add to comparison Make Model New comparison

Dimensions	R14 - R21	R13 - R16
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium

2. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 132

2. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 31

Number of tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 15x

2. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 4x

Best position in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 4.

2. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 10.

Worst position in test

1. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 17.

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 18.

Average position in tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 7.87

2. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 13.25

Year of the last test

1. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 2022

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 2018

Best rating in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Good

2. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Sufficient

Worst rating in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Good

2. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Sufficient

Wet

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

78.6%

Fulda
Kristall Montero 3

44.4%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 B

2. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 C

Dry

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

81.7%

Fulda
Kristall Montero 3

63%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

76.6%

Fulda
Kristall Montero 3

0%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 C

2. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 E

Snow

(Overall rating)

Fulda
Kristall Montero 3

89.4%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

77.4%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

49.6%

Fulda
Kristall Montero 3

0%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 68 dB

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 71 dB

Ice

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001

80%

Fulda
Kristall Montero 3

78%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild

Autobild Winter tyre test 2015 185/60 R15

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	36,8	27,7
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001	43,4	28,1
Fulda Kristall Montero 3	42,8	27,7
Show test details

Autobild

Autobild Winter tyre test 2015 185/60 R15

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	1	2+	1	1
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: -	2-	2-	2+	1-
Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Rating: -	3+	2-	2+	2
Show test details