Segment
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Upper-middle3. Apollo Aspire XP Winter Lowcost4. GT Radial WinterPro2 Sport Lowcost5. Viking WinTech Lowcost6. Giti Gitiwinter W2 Lowcost8. Laufenn i*Fit + LW31 Lowcost
Comparison: Apollo Aspire XP Winter vs. GT Radial WinterPro2 Sport vs. Viking WinTech vs. Giti Gitiwinter W2 vs. GT Radial Champiro WinterPro HP vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 vs. Kleber Quadraxer 3 vs. Laufenn i*Fit + LW31
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
4. Giti Gitiwinter W2 13.777. Viking WinTech 20.83
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Apollo Aspire XP Winter Exemplary2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Highly recommended5. Viking WinTech Recommended6. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Satisfactory7. GT Radial Champiro WinterPro HP Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
4. Viking WinTech Conditionally recommended5. GT Radial Champiro WinterPro HP Conditionally recommended6. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Sufficient7. Giti Gitiwinter W2 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Enviromental impact | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1.7 | ||||||
| Apollo Aspire XP Winter Rating: Poor | 2.7 | ||||||
| GT Radial WinterPro2 Sport Rating: Satisfactory | 3.0 | ||||||
| Giti GitiWinter W2 Rating: Sufficient | 3.1 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.6 | 27.1 | |||||
| Apollo Aspire XP Winter | 37.3 | 28.7 | |||||
| GT Radial WinterPro2 Sport | 39.2 | ||||||
| Giti GitiWinter W2 | 37.7 | 28.4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
