Segment
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle2. Uniroyal WinterExpert Upper-middle3. Apollo Alnac 4G Winter Lowcost
Comparison: Apollo Alnac 4G Winter vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 vs. Uniroyal WinterExpert
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Uniroyal WinterExpert 11.25
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Satisfactory3. Uniroyal WinterExpert Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Sufficient3. Uniroyal WinterExpert Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | |||
| Apollo Alnac 4G Winter Rating: Good | 2 | 2- | 2 | 2 | |||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 3 | 2+ | 3 | |||
| Uniroyal WinterExpert Rating: Good | 2 | 2- | 2 | 2 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34.6 | 28.9 | |||||
| Apollo Alnac 4G Winter | 36.4 | 30.6 | |||||
| Kumho Wintercraft WP52 | 34.6 | 30.3 | |||||
| Uniroyal WinterExpert | 36.5 | 29.5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
