Segment
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle2. Apollo Alnac 4G Winter Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from India (Apollo) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Kumho winter tyres are slightly better rated (63%) than Apollo (57%). In this particular case, the Apollo Alnac 4G Winter has a better rating of 60% compared to 55% of the Kumho WinterCraft WP52. The first tyre test of Apollo Alnac 4G Winter was done in 2024, compared to 2022 when was the Kumho WinterCraft WP52 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the Alnac 4G Winter and the WinterCraft WP52 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Apollo Alnac 4G Winter
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R16 | R0 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle2. Apollo Alnac 4G Winter Lowcost
2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Satisfactory
2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Sufficient
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | |||
| Apollo Alnac 4G Winter Rating: Good | 2 | 2- | 2 | 2 | |||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 3 | 2+ | 3 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34.6 | 28.9 | |||||
| Apollo Alnac 4G Winter | 36.4 | 30.6 | |||||
| Kumho Wintercraft WP52 | 34.6 | 30.3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||