In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from India (Apollo) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Kumho winter tyres are slightly better rated (63%) than Apollo (57%). In this particular case, the Apollo Alnac 4G Winter has a better rating of 60% compared to 55% of the Kumho WinterCraft WP52. The first tyre test of Apollo Alnac 4G Winter was done in 2024, compared to 2022 when was the Kumho WinterCraft WP52 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the Alnac 4G Winter and the WinterCraft WP52 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s) with detailed performance data. This page shows you a comprehensive comparison based on actual head-to-head test results instead of general rankings.
You can explore discipline-by-discipline comparisons, view the spider chart, check price differences, and see which tests were used for this analysis. Or view the general comparison →
Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results
| Organization | Season | Year | Dimension | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AUTOBILD
|
Winter
|
2024 | 205/55 R16 | View |
Apollo Alnac 4G Winter
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
Apollo Alnac 4G Winter
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
Apollo Alnac 4G Winter
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
Apollo Alnac 4G Winter
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
Apollo Alnac 4G Winter
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
Apollo Alnac 4G Winter
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
Apollo Alnac 4G Winter
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
Apollo Alnac 4G Winter
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
Apollo Alnac 4G Winter
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
Apollo Alnac 4G Winter
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
Apollo Alnac 4G Winter
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
Apollo Alnac 4G Winter
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
Apollo Alnac 4G Winter
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.
Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.