Segment
1. Nokian Powerproof Upper-middle2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Upper-middle3. Zeetex HP2000 VFM Lowcost4. Imperial EcoSport 2 Lowcost
Comparison: Zeetex HP2000 VFM vs. Nokian Powerproof vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Imperial EcoSport 2
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Nokian Powerproof 7.452. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 11.58
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian Powerproof Exemplary2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Highly recommended3. Zeetex HP2000 VFM Conditionally recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Conditionally recommended2. Zeetex HP2000 VFM Conditionally recommended3. Nokian Powerproof Conditionally recommended
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
3
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,7 | 27,5 | |||||
| Zeetex HP2000 VFM | 38,9 | 33,9 | |||||
| Nokian Powerproof | 35,7 | 28,9 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 | 36,2 | 29,9 | |||||
| Imperial Ecosport 2 | 40,3 | 33,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Zeetex HP2000 VFM Rating: Conditionally recommended | 2- | 2- | 3+ | ||||
| Nokian Powerproof Rating: Good | 1- | 2+ | 2- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| Zeetex HP2000 VFM | 36 | 31,8 | |||||
| Nokian Powerproof | 32,9 | 29,1 | |||||
| Imperial Ecosport 2 | 37,3 | 38,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
