Segment
1. Nokian Powerproof Upper-middle2. Firestone Roadhawk Upper-middle3. Zeetex HP2000 VFM Lowcost4. Fulda SportControl 2 Lowcost
Comparison: Zeetex HP2000 VFM vs. Nokian Powerproof vs. Fulda SportControl 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Nokian Powerproof 7.452. Fulda SportControl 2 11.07
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Fulda SportControl 2 Exemplary2. Firestone Roadhawk Exemplary3. Nokian Powerproof Exemplary4. Zeetex HP2000 VFM Conditionally recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Fulda SportControl 2 Satisfactory2. Firestone Roadhawk Conditionally recommended3. Zeetex HP2000 VFM Conditionally recommended4. Nokian Powerproof Conditionally recommended
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
3
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,7 | 27,5 | |||||
| Zeetex HP2000 VFM | 38,9 | 33,9 | |||||
| Nokian Powerproof | 35,7 | 28,9 | |||||
| Fulda SportControl 2 | 36,5 | 29,4 | |||||
| Firestone Roadhawk | 37,7 | 32,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Zeetex HP2000 VFM Rating: Conditionally recommended | 2- | 2- | 3+ | ||||
| Nokian Powerproof Rating: Good | 1- | 2+ | 2- | ||||
| Fulda SportControl 2 Rating: Good | 2 | 2+ | 2- | ||||
| Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Good | 2+ | 2 | 2- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| Zeetex HP2000 VFM | 36 | 31,8 | |||||
| Nokian Powerproof | 32,9 | 29,1 | |||||
| Fulda SportControl 2 | 34,2 | 31,7 | |||||
| Firestone Roadhawk | 34,3 | 30,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
