Segment
1. Nokian Powerproof Upper-middle2. Firestone Roadhawk Upper-middle3. Zeetex HP2000 VFM Lowcost
Comparison: Zeetex HP2000 VFM vs. Nokian Powerproof vs. Firestone Roadhawk
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Nokian Powerproof 7.45
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Firestone Roadhawk Exemplary2. Nokian Powerproof Exemplary3. Zeetex HP2000 VFM Conditionally recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Firestone Roadhawk Conditionally recommended2. Zeetex HP2000 VFM Conditionally recommended3. Nokian Powerproof Conditionally recommended
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
3
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,7 | 27,5 | |||||
| Zeetex HP2000 VFM | 38,9 | 33,9 | |||||
| Nokian Powerproof | 35,7 | 28,9 | |||||
| Firestone Roadhawk | 37,7 | 32,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Zeetex HP2000 VFM Rating: Conditionally recommended | 2- | 2- | 3+ | ||||
| Nokian Powerproof Rating: Good | 1- | 2+ | 2- | ||||
| Firestone Roadhawk Rating: Good | 2+ | 2 | 2- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| Zeetex HP2000 VFM | 36 | 31,8 | |||||
| Nokian Powerproof | 32,9 | 29,1 | |||||
| Firestone Roadhawk | 34,3 | 30,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
