Segment
1. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 Premium2. Nokian Powerproof Upper-middle3. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Upper-middle4. Zeetex HP2000 VFM Lowcost
Comparison: Zeetex HP2000 VFM vs. Nokian Powerproof vs. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Nokian Powerproof 7.453. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 11.58
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian Powerproof Exemplary2. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 Highly recommended3. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Highly recommended4. Zeetex HP2000 VFM Conditionally recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 Still recommended2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Conditionally recommended3. Zeetex HP2000 VFM Conditionally recommended4. Nokian Powerproof Conditionally recommended
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
3
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,7 | 27,5 | |||||
| Zeetex HP2000 VFM | 38,9 | 33,9 | |||||
| Nokian Powerproof | 35,7 | 28,9 | |||||
| Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 | 36,1 | 28,8 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 | 36,2 | 29,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Zeetex HP2000 VFM Rating: Conditionally recommended | 2- | 2- | 3+ | ||||
| Nokian Powerproof Rating: Good | 1- | 2+ | 2- | ||||
| Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| Zeetex HP2000 VFM | 36 | 31,8 | |||||
| Nokian Powerproof | 32,9 | 29,1 | |||||
| Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 | 34,3 | 33 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
