Segment
1. Nokian Powerproof Upper-middle2. Zeetex HP2000 VFM Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Zeetex) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Nokian summer tyres are slightly better rated (61%) than Zeetex (0%). The first tyre test of Zeetex HP2000 VFM was done in 2020, compared to 2019 when was the Nokian Powerproof first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the HP2000 VFM and the Powerproof were tested. See more mutual tests below.
# | Zeetex HP2000 VFM
| Nokian Powerproof
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R18 - R18 | R17 - R20 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Nokian Powerproof Upper-middle2. Zeetex HP2000 VFM Lowcost
1. Nokian Powerproof 7.45
1. Nokian Powerproof Exemplary2. Zeetex HP2000 VFM Conditionally recommended
1. Zeetex HP2000 VFM Conditionally recommended2. Nokian Powerproof Conditionally recommended
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 35,7 | 27,5 | |||||
Zeetex HP2000 VFM | 38,9 | 33,9 | |||||
Nokian Powerproof | 35,7 | 28,9 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1 | 1- | 1 | ||||
Zeetex HP2000 VFM Rating: Conditionally recommended | 2- | 2- | 3+ | ||||
Nokian Powerproof Rating: Good | 1- | 2+ | 2- | ||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
Zeetex HP2000 VFM | 36 | 31,8 | |||||
Nokian Powerproof | 32,9 | 29,1 | |||||
Show test details |