Segment
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Upper-middle2. Zeetex HP2000 VFM Lowcost
Comparison: Zeetex HP2000 VFM vs. Falken Azenis FK510
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Zeetex) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken). Generally, Falken summer tyres are slightly better rated (68%) than Zeetex (0%). The first tyre test of Zeetex HP2000 VFM was done in 2020, compared to 2016 when was the Falken Azenis FK510 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2020 245/45 R18 test, where both the HP2000 VFM and the Azenis FK510 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Zeetex HP2000 VFM
| Falken Azenis FK510
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R18 - R18 | R17 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Exemplary2. Zeetex HP2000 VFM Conditionally recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Recommended2. Zeetex HP2000 VFM Conditionally recommended
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Zeetex HP2000 VFM Rating: Conditionally recommended | 2- | 2- | 3+ | ||||
| Falken Azenis FK510 Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2 | 1- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| Zeetex HP2000 VFM | 36 | 31,8 | |||||
| Falken Azenis FK510 | 36 | 30,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
