Segment
1. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 Premium2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Upper-middle3. Zeetex HP2000 VFM Lowcost4. Imperial EcoSport 2 Lowcost
Comparison: Zeetex HP2000 VFM vs. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Imperial EcoSport 2
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 11.58
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 Highly recommended2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Highly recommended3. Zeetex HP2000 VFM Conditionally recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 Still recommended2. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 Conditionally recommended3. Zeetex HP2000 VFM Conditionally recommended
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
3
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,7 | 27,5 | |||||
| Zeetex HP2000 VFM | 38,9 | 33,9 | |||||
| Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 | 36,1 | 28,8 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP4 | 36,2 | 29,9 | |||||
| Imperial Ecosport 2 | 40,3 | 33,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Zeetex HP2000 VFM Rating: Conditionally recommended | 2- | 2- | 3+ | ||||
| Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| Zeetex HP2000 VFM | 36 | 31,8 | |||||
| Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 | 34,3 | 33 | |||||
| Imperial Ecosport 2 | 37,3 | 38,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
