Segment
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium2. Zeetex HP2000 VFM Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Zeetex) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (84%) than Zeetex (0%). The first tyre test of Zeetex HP2000 VFM was done in 2020, compared to 2017 when was the Continental PremiumContact 6 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2020 245/45 R18 test, where both the HP2000 VFM and the PremiumContact 6 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
# | Zeetex HP2000 VFM
| Continental PremiumContact 6
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R18 - R18 | R15 - R22 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium2. Zeetex HP2000 VFM Lowcost
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Exemplary2. Zeetex HP2000 VFM Conditionally recommended
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Recommended2. Zeetex HP2000 VFM Conditionally recommended
Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1 | 1- | 1 | ||||
Zeetex HP2000 VFM Rating: Conditionally recommended | 2- | 2- | 3+ | ||||
Continental PremiumContact 6 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 1- | 1 | ||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
Zeetex HP2000 VFM | 36 | 31,8 | |||||
Continental PremiumContact 6 | 33,2 | 30,2 | |||||
Show test details |