18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Yokohama W.drive V905 vs. Kleber KRISALP HP3 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 vs. Falken EuroWinter HS01

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Yokohama W.drive V905 /0%	Kleber KRISALP HP3 /77%	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /81%	Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 /0%	Falken EuroWinter HS01 /0%

Dimensions	R16 - R19	R14 - R20	R14 - R19	R13 - R23	R13 - R21
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Yokohama W.drive V905 Upper-middle

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 Upper-middle

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

4. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Upper-middle

5. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 533

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 359

3. Kleber KRISALP HP3 113

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

5. Yokohama W.drive V905 8

Number of tests

1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 28x

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 23x

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 23x

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 10x

5. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 4x

Best position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 2.

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 5.

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 7.

5. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 11.

Worst position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 16.

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 21.

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 24.

5. Falken EuroWinter HS01 30.

Average position in tests

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.65

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 8.04

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 11.04

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 14

5. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 16.75

Year of the last test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2025

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 2025

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 2022

4. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 2020

5. Yokohama W.drive V905 2019

Best rating in test

1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 Exemplary

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 Satisfactory

4. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Satisfactory

5. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 Good

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Satisfactory

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 Conditionally recommended

5. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Sufficient

Wet

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

87%

Kleber
KRISALP HP3

80%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

79.6%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

73%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

73%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 92%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 83%

3. Kleber KRISALP HP3 82%

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 72%

5. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 0%

Wet circle cornering

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 84%

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 81%

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 73%

4. Falken EuroWinter HS01 56%

5. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 0%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 100%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 94%

3. Kleber KRISALP HP3 84%

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 73%

5. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 0%

Wet handling

1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 80%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 79%

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 73%

4. Falken EuroWinter HS01 59%

5. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 0%

Wet braking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 81%

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 77%

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 77%

4. Falken EuroWinter HS01 72%

5. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 0%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 B

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 C

4. Kleber KRISALP HP3 ?

5. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

Snow

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

92%

Kleber
KRISALP HP3

90%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

78%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

70.5%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

64%

Snow traction

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 97%

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 88%

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 88%

4. Falken EuroWinter HS01 67%

5. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 0%

Dry

(Overall rating)

Yokohama
W.drive V905

88%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

83.9%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

77%

Kleber
KRISALP HP3

76%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

70%

Costs

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

81%

Kleber
KRISALP HP3

80%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

78%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

78.6%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

70%

Mileage

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 79%

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 70%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 61%

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 62%

5. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 0%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 C

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 D

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

4. Kleber KRISALP HP3 ?

5. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

Comfort

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

90%

Kleber
KRISALP HP3

78%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

72.2%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

70%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

61%

Exterior noise

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 95%

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 77%

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 69%

4. Falken EuroWinter HS01 60%

5. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 0%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 72 dB

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

3. Kleber KRISALP HP3 ?

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

5. Falken EuroWinter HS01 ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Kleber
KRISALP HP3

85%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

82%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80.5%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

80.7%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

74%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 5 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2019 225/45 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Yokohama W.drive V905 Rating: Good	2-	2-	2-	2
Kleber KRISALP HP3 Rating: Satisfactory	2+	3+	1-	2-
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	2+	2-	1-	2
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2018 195/65 R15

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34,3	27
Yokohama W.drive V905	36,6	29,5
Kleber KRISALP HP3	35,9	27,1
Falken EuroWinter HS01	36,2	28
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Yokohama W.drive V905 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2-	2	2-
Kleber KRISALP HP3 Rating: Good	2	2-	1-	2
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	2	2-	1	2
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,2	25,9
Yokohama W.drive V905	34,7	28,3
Kleber KRISALP HP3	35,7	26,7
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	35,1	25,9
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2017 195/65 R15

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	1,8	1,7	1,7	2,1	3,0	1,5	1,7
Yokohama W.drive V905 Rating: Satisfactory	2,6	1,7	2,2	2,5	3,7	3,0	2,0
Kleber KRISALP HP3 Rating: Good	2,5	2,3	2,1	2,5	3,3	2,0	2,0
Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Satisfactory	2,6	2,6	3,1	2,9	3,6	2,5	2,3
Show test details

Comparison: Yokohama W.drive V905 vs. Kleber KRISALP HP3 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 vs. Falken EuroWinter HS01

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands