18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Yokohama W.drive V905 vs. Kleber KRISALP HP3 vs. Barum Polaris 5 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Yokohama W.drive V905 /0%	Kleber KRISALP HP3 /77%	Barum Polaris 5 /63%	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /81%	Hankook Ventus Prime 4 /72%

Dimensions	R16 - R19	R14 - R20	R13 - R19	R14 - R19	R13 - R23
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Premium

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 Upper-middle

3. Kleber KRISALP HP3 Upper-middle

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

5. Barum Polaris 5 Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 530

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 113

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

4. Barum Polaris 5 76

5. Yokohama W.drive V905 8

Number of tests

1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 28x

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 23x

3. Barum Polaris 5 13x

4. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 12x

5. Yokohama W.drive V905 10x

Best position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 2.

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 2.

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 7.

5. Barum Polaris 5 9.

Worst position in test

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 9.

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

3. Kleber KRISALP HP3 16.

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 24.

5. Barum Polaris 5 26.

Average position in tests

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 5.75

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.65

3. Kleber KRISALP HP3 8.04

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 14

5. Barum Polaris 5 15.15

Year of the last test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2025

2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 2025

3. Kleber KRISALP HP3 2025

4. Barum Polaris 5 2023

5. Yokohama W.drive V905 2019

Best rating in test

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Exemplary

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 Exemplary

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

4. Barum Polaris 5 Good

5. Yokohama W.drive V905 Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 Good

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Recommended

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 Conditionally recommended

5. Barum Polaris 5 Sufficient

Wet

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

87%

Kleber
KRISALP HP3

80%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

73%

Hankook
Ventus Prime 4

73.7%

Barum
Polaris 5

61.8%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 A

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

3. Barum Polaris 5 C

4. Kleber KRISALP HP3 ?

5. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

Snow

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

92%

Kleber
KRISALP HP3

90%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

78%

Barum
Polaris 5

76.1%

Hankook
Ventus Prime 4

?

Dry

(Overall rating)

Yokohama
W.drive V905

88%

Hankook
Ventus Prime 4

81.2%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

77%

Kleber
KRISALP HP3

76%

Barum
Polaris 5

70.5%

Costs

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

81%

Kleber
KRISALP HP3

80%

Barum
Polaris 5

79.8%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

78%

Hankook
Ventus Prime 4

77.5%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 C

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

3. Barum Polaris 5 E

4. Kleber KRISALP HP3 ?

5. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

Comfort

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

90%

Kleber
KRISALP HP3

78%

Hankook
Ventus Prime 4

76.9%

Barum
Polaris 5

73.3%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

70%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 ?

3. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 ?

4. Barum Polaris 5 ?

5. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Kleber
KRISALP HP3

85%

Barum
Polaris 5

82%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

82%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80.5%

Hankook
Ventus Prime 4

?

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 5 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2019 225/45 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Yokohama W.drive V905 Rating: Good	2-	2-	2-	2
Kleber KRISALP HP3 Rating: Satisfactory	2+	3+	1-	2-
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	2+	2-	1-	2
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2018 195/65 R15

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34,3	27
Yokohama W.drive V905	36,6	29,5
Kleber KRISALP HP3	35,9	27,1
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Yokohama W.drive V905 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2-	2	2-
Kleber KRISALP HP3 Rating: Good	2	2-	1-	2
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	2	2-	1	2
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,2	25,9
Yokohama W.drive V905	34,7	28,3
Kleber KRISALP HP3	35,7	26,7
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	35,1	25,9
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2017 195/65 R15

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	1,8	1,7	1,7	2,1	3,0	1,5	1,7
Yokohama W.drive V905 Rating: Satisfactory	2,6	1,7	2,2	2,5	3,7	3,0	2,0
Kleber KRISALP HP3 Rating: Good	2,5	2,3	2,1	2,5	3,3	2,0	2,0
Show test details

Comparison: Yokohama W.drive V905 vs. Kleber KRISALP HP3 vs. Barum Polaris 5 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands