18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Yokohama W.drive V905 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Yokohama W.drive V905 /0%	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /81%	Uniroyal MS plus 77 /0%

Dimensions	R16 - R19	R14 - R19	R13 - R19
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Yokohama W.drive V905 Upper-middle

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 76

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 8

Number of tests

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 23x

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 19x

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 10x

Best position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 3.

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 7.

Worst position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 17.

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 24.

Average position in tests

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.65

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 11.21

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 14

Year of the last test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2025

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 2020

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 2019

Best rating in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 Conditionally recommended

Wet

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

87%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

82%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

73%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

Snow

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

92%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

84%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

78%

Dry

(Overall rating)

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

83%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

83%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

77%

Costs

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

81%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

80%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

76%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

Comfort

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

90%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

82%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

79%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 ?

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80.5%

Uniroyal
MS plus 77

75.2%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

74.8%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2019 225/45 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Yokohama W.drive V905 Rating: Good	2-	2-	2-	2
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	2+	2-	1-	2
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: Good	2	2-	2+	2-
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Yokohama W.drive V905 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2-	2	2-
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	2	2-	1	2
Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2-	2	2+
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,2	25,9
Yokohama W.drive V905	34,7	28,3
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	35,1	25,9
Uniroyal MS plus 77	36	28,1
Show test details

Comparison: Yokohama W.drive V905 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands