12 shops, 56 847 products

|

TheTyreLab.com
Vs
Yokohama W Drive V905
Bfgoodrich G Force Winter 2

Comparison: Yokohama W.drive V905 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, BFGoodrich winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Yokohama (46%). The first tyre test of Yokohama W.drive V905 was done in 2015, compared to 2017 when was the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 225/45 R17 test, where both the W.drive V905 and the G-FORCE WINTER 2 were tested. See more mutual tests below.

#	Yokohama W.drive V905 /0%	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /81%	Add to comparison Make Model New comparison

Dimensions	R16 - R19	R14 - R19
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Yokohama W.drive V905 Upper-middle

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 8

Number of tests

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 23x

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 10x

Best position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 7.

Worst position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 24.

Average position in tests

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.65

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 14

Year of the last test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2025

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 2019

Best rating in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 Conditionally recommended

Wet

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

87%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

73%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

Snow

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

92%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

78%

Dry

(Overall rating)

Yokohama
W.drive V905

83%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

77%

Costs

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

81%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

80%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

Comfort

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

90%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

79%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80.5%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

74.8%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild

Autobild Winter tyre test 2019 225/45 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Yokohama W.drive V905 Rating: Good	2-	2-	2-	2
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	2+	2-	1-	2
Show test details

Autobild

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Yokohama W.drive V905 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2-	2	2-
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	2	2-	1	2
Show test details

Autobild

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,2	25,9
Yokohama W.drive V905	34,7	28,3
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	35,1	25,9
Show test details