Comparison: Yokohama W.drive V905 vs. Barum Polaris 3 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

#	Yokohama W.drive V905 /0%	Barum Polaris 3 /0%	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /81%	Add to comparison Make Model New comparison

Dimensions	R16 - R19	R13 - R18	R14 - R19
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Yokohama W.drive V905

/0%

Barum Polaris 3

/0%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

/81%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

New comparison

Dimensions

R16 - R19

R13 - R18

R14 - R19

Price

Set dimension to see prices

Remove

Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Yokohama W.drive V905 Upper-middle

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

3. Barum Polaris 3 Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

2. Barum Polaris 3 66

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 8

Number of tests

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 23x

2. Barum Polaris 3 10x

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 10x

Best position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Barum Polaris 3 3.

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 7.

Worst position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

2. Barum Polaris 3 16.

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 24.

Average position in tests

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.65

2. Barum Polaris 3 10.6

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 14

Year of the last test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2025

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 2019

3. Barum Polaris 3 2018

Best rating in test

1. Barum Polaris 3 Exemplary

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

2. Barum Polaris 3 Satisfactory

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 Conditionally recommended

Wet

(Overall rating)

Barum
Polaris 3

73.6%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

70.3%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

68.9%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

2. Barum Polaris 3 C

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

Snow

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

93.2%

Barum
Polaris 3

87.3%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

74%

Dry

(Overall rating)

Yokohama
W.drive V905

91.1%

Barum
Polaris 3

79%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

71.8%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Barum
Polaris 3

79%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

75%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

71.8%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

2. Barum Polaris 3 F

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Barum
Polaris 3

79%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

79.3%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

59.4%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Barum Polaris 3 ?

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80.5%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

74.8%

Barum
Polaris 3

0%

Add to comparison

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2018 195/65 R15

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34,3	27
Yokohama W.drive V905	36,6	29,5
Barum Polaris 3	36,7	27,8
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Yokohama W.drive V905 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2-	2	2-
Barum Polaris 3 Rating: Satisfactory	3+	2	1-	2+
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	2	2-	1	2
Show test details