12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Yokohama BluEarth winter V906 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 vs. Nokian WR Snowproof vs. Nokian WR Snowproof P

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Yokohama BluEarth winter V906 /49%	Kumho WinterCraft WP52 /55%	Nokian WR Snowproof /41%	Nokian WR Snowproof P /67%

Dimensions	R15 - R21	R0 - R21	R14 - R20	R17 - R21
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V906 Upper-middle

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Upper-middle

3. Nokian WR Snowproof Upper-middle

4. Nokian WR Snowproof P Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 192

2. Nokian WR Snowproof 60

3. Nokian WR Snowproof P 55

4. Yokohama BluEarth winter V906 30

Number of tests

1. Nokian WR Snowproof 14x

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 10x

3. Nokian WR Snowproof P 7x

4. Yokohama BluEarth winter V906 6x

Best position in test

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 2.

2. Nokian WR Snowproof P 4.

3. Nokian WR Snowproof 5.

4. Yokohama BluEarth winter V906 8.

Worst position in test

1. Nokian WR Snowproof P 18.

2. Nokian WR Snowproof 20.

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 25.

4. Yokohama BluEarth winter V906 30.

Average position in tests

1. Nokian WR Snowproof P 9.71

2. Nokian WR Snowproof 11.07

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 12.2

4. Yokohama BluEarth winter V906 18.83

Year of the last test

1. Nokian WR Snowproof P 2025

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V906 2025

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 2024

4. Nokian WR Snowproof 2023

Best rating in test

1. Nokian WR Snowproof Satisfactory

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Satisfactory

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V906 Satisfactory

4. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Nokian WR Snowproof Satisfactory

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V906 Satisfactory

3. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactory

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Sufficient

Wet

(Overall rating)

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V906

70%

Nokian
WR Snowproof

66.7%

Nokian
WR Snowproof P

64.1%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52

62%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V906 B

2. Nokian WR Snowproof B

3. Nokian WR Snowproof P B

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 B

Snow

(Overall rating)

Nokian
WR Snowproof

78.6%

Nokian
WR Snowproof P

77.2%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52

69%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V906

55%

Dry

(Overall rating)

Nokian
WR Snowproof P

90.3%

Nokian
WR Snowproof

80.5%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V906

73%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52

70%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Nokian
WR Snowproof P

84.7%

Nokian
WR Snowproof

83.1%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52

58%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V906

43%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Nokian WR Snowproof P C

2. Nokian WR Snowproof C

3. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 C

4. Yokohama BluEarth winter V906 D

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Nokian
WR Snowproof P

91.7%

Nokian
WR Snowproof

84.4%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V906

67%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP52

59%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Nokian WR Snowproof P 70 dB

2. Nokian WR Snowproof ?

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V906 ?

4. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 ?

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 4 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

AUTOBILD Winter tyre test 2024 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Yokohama BluEarth Winter V906 Rating: Satisfactory	3+	3+	3+	3+
Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Rating: Satisfactory	3+	3	2+	3
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2024 215/55 R17

Name	Winter	Wet	Dry	Enviromental impact	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	1.7	2.1	2.2	1.7	2.7	1.6	1.3
Yokohama BluEarth Winter V906 Rating: Satisfactory	2.9	2.4	2.9	3.1	3.8	3.1	1.7
Kumho WinterCraft WP52 Rating: Sufficient	2.3	2.6	3.6	2.6	3.9	1.8	1.5
Show test details