Segment
1. Yokohama BluEarth-4S AW21 Upper-middle2. Toyo Celsius AS2 Upper-middle
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from Japan. Generally, Toyo allround tyres are slightly better rated (52%) than Yokohama (26%). In this particular case, the Toyo Celsius AS2 has a better rating of 52% compared to 26% of the Yokohama BluEarth-4S AW21. The first tyre test of Yokohama BluEarth-4S AW21 was done in 2019, compared to 2022 when was the Toyo Celsius AS2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the BluEarth-4S AW21 and the Celsius AS2 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Yokohama BluEarth-4S AW21
| Toyo Celsius AS2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R22 | R15 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Yokohama BluEarth-4S AW21 Upper-middle2. Toyo Celsius AS2 Upper-middle
1. Toyo Celsius AS2 11.64
1. Yokohama BluEarth-4S AW21 Satisfactory2. Toyo Celsius AS2 Satisfactory
1. Yokohama BluEarth-4S AW21 Satisfactory2. Toyo Celsius AS2 Conditionally recommended
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Points total | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 5.4 | 1.8 | 2.3 | ||||
| Yokohama BluEarth-4S AW21 Rating: Satisfactory | 4 | 3.3 | 4 | ||||
| Toyo Celsius AS2 Rating: Satisfactory | 3.8 | 2.3 | 3.8 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 37.7 | 45 | |||||
| Yokohama BluEarth-4S AW21 | 42.9 | 52.4 | |||||
| Toyo Celsius AS2 | 40.9 | 50.6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||