Segment
1. Yokohama BluEarth-4S AW21 Upper-middle2. Nokian WeatherProof Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Nokian allround tyres are slightly better rated (61%) than Yokohama (35%). The first tyre test of Yokohama BluEarth-4S AW21 was done in 2019, compared to 2015 when was the Nokian WeatherProof first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2020 205/55 R16 test, where both the BluEarth-4S AW21 and the WeatherProof were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 90% of Yokohama BluEarth-4S AW21 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (67%) of the Nokian WeatherProof also have B wet ratings.
# | Yokohama BluEarth-4S AW21
| Nokian WeatherProof
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R14 - R22 | R13 - R19 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Yokohama BluEarth-4S AW21 Upper-middle2. Nokian WeatherProof Upper-middle
1. Nokian WeatherProof Good +2. Yokohama BluEarth-4S AW21 Satisfactory
1. Yokohama BluEarth-4S AW21 Satisfactory2. Nokian WeatherProof Sufficient
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 39,7 | 45 | |||||
Yokohama BluEarth-4S AW21 | 44 | 52,9 | |||||
Nokian WeatherProof | 45,2 | 51,6 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 39,5 | 46,3 | |||||
Yokohama BluEarth-4S AW21 | 44,1 | 52,1 | |||||
Nokian WeatherProof | 44,5 | 51,3 | |||||
Show test details |