Segment
1. Continental PremiumContact 7 Premium2. Vredestein ULTRAC Premium3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Upper-middle4. Toyo Proxes Comfort Upper-middle5. Westlake ZuperEco Z-107 Lowcost6. Maxxis Premitra HP5 Lowcost
Comparison: Westlake ZuperEco Z-107 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Vredestein ULTRAC vs. Toyo Proxes Comfort vs. Maxxis Premitra HP5
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.673. Vredestein ULTRAC 7.25
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein ULTRAC Highly recommended2. Continental PremiumContact 7 Test winner3. Maxxis Premitra HP5 Very good5. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good
Worst rating in test
2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good3. Toyo Proxes Comfort Satisfactory4. Maxxis Premitra HP5 Conditionally recommended5. Vredestein ULTRAC Sufficient
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,4 | 25,8 | |||||
| Westlake ZuperEco Z-107 | 38,6 | 31,5 | |||||
| Continental PremiumContact 7 | 35,4 | 25,8 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 | 35,4 | 26,1 | |||||
| Vredestein ULTRAC | 36,1 | 26,6 | |||||
| Toyo Proxes Comfort | 36,7 | 27,5 | |||||
| Maxxis Premitra HP5 | 36,2 | 28,4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
