Segment
1. Continental PremiumContact 7 Premium2. Vredestein ULTRAC Premium3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Upper-middle4. Westlake ZuperEco Z-107 Lowcost
Comparison: Westlake ZuperEco Z-107 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Vredestein ULTRAC
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.673. Vredestein ULTRAC 7.25
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein ULTRAC Highly recommended2. Continental PremiumContact 7 Test winner3. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good
Worst rating in test
2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good3. Vredestein ULTRAC Sufficient
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,4 | 25,8 | |||||
| Westlake ZuperEco Z-107 | 38,6 | 31,5 | |||||
| Continental PremiumContact 7 | 35,4 | 25,8 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 | 35,4 | 26,1 | |||||
| Vredestein ULTRAC | 36,1 | 26,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
