Segment
1. Westlake SW608 Lowcost2. Imperial SnowDragon UHP Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from China (Westlake) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Netherlands (Imperial). But when it comes to comparing Westlake SW608 and Imperial SnowDragon UHP, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Westlake SW608 was done in 2015, compared to 2020 when was the Imperial SnowDragon UHP first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2025 225/40 R18 test, where both the SW608 and the SnowDragon UHP were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Westlake SW608
| Imperial SnowDragon UHP
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R17 | R16 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Westlake SW608 Lowcost2. Imperial SnowDragon UHP Lowcost
2. Westlake SW608 31.4
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.6 | ||||||
| Westlake SW608 | 40.9 | ||||||
| Imperial SnowDragon UHP | 40.4 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,8 | ||||||
| Westlake SW608 | 39,3 | ||||||
| Imperial SnowDragon UHP | 39,1 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||