Segment
1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 Upper-middle3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Upper-middle4. Westlake SW608 Lowcost
Comparison: Westlake SW608 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Kleber KRISALP HP3 vs. Firestone Winterhawk 3
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
4. Westlake SW608 31.4
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 Exemplary2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Conditionally recommended
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
3
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.6 | ||||||
| Westlake SW608 | 40.9 | ||||||
| BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 | 36.0 | 27.3 | |||||
| Kleber Krisalp HP3 | 36.2 | 27.1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,8 | ||||||
| Westlake SW608 | 39,3 | ||||||
| BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 | 35,8 | 25,4 | |||||
| Kleber KRISALP HP3 | 37,3 | 25,5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,2 | 25,9 | |||||
| Westlake SW608 | 37 | 36,2 | |||||
| BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 | 35,1 | 25,9 | |||||
| Kleber KRISALP HP3 | 35,7 | 26,7 | |||||
| Firestone Winterhawk 3 | 36,3 | 27,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
