Segment
1. Vredestein Wintrac Pro Premium2. Viking WinTech Lowcost
Comparison: Vredestein Wintrac Pro vs. Viking WinTech
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein) against a tyre from a manufacturer from (Viking). Generally, Vredestein winter tyres are slightly better rated (59%) than Viking (53%). In this particular case, the Vredestein Wintrac Pro has a better rating of 54% compared to 53% of the Viking WinTech. The first tyre test of Vredestein Wintrac Pro was done in 2018, compared to 2019 when was the Viking WinTech first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2024 215/55 R17 test, where both the Wintrac Pro and the WinTech were tested. See more mutual tests below. We also know where Wintrac Pro is made - Netherlands/Hungary.
| # | Vredestein Wintrac Pro
| Viking WinTech
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R22 | R13 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Viking WinTech 20.83
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein Wintrac Pro Exemplary2. Viking WinTech Recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Vredestein Wintrac Pro Recommended2. Viking WinTech Conditionally recommended
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow traction
Snow braking
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Offroad
(Overall rating)Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 5 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
5
Mutual tests
| Name | Winter | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1.7 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 1.7 | 2.7 | 1.6 | 1.3 |
| Vredestein Wintrac Pro Rating: Good | 2.4 | 2.4 | 2.2 | 2.3 | 2.9 | 2.0 | 2.1 |
| Viking WinTech Rating: Satisfactory | 2.8 | 2.8 | 3.6 | 3.1 | 4.3 | 3.0 | 2.2 |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | |||
| Vredestein Wintrac Pro Rating: Good | 2- | 2- | 2+ | 3+ | |||
| Viking WinTech Rating: Conditionally recommended | 3+ | 2- | 2 | 2 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 31,4 | 29,2 | |||||
| Vredestein Wintrac Pro | 36,4 | 30,6 | |||||
| Viking WinTech | 36,0 | 31,0 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,8 | 25,4 | |||||
| Vredestein Wintrac Pro | 36,9 | 26,3 | |||||
| Viking WinTech | 37,1 | 27,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 29,2 | 24 | |||||
| Vredestein Wintrac Pro | 30,8 | 25,2 | |||||
| Viking WinTech | 35,8 | - | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
