Segment
1. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Premium2. Nokian zLine Upper-middle3. Yokohama Advan Sport V105 Upper-middle4. Semperit Speed-Life 2 Lowcost
Comparison: Vredestein Ultrac Vorti vs. Nokian zLine vs. Yokohama Advan Sport V105 vs. Semperit Speed-Life 2
This direct comparison of the Vredestein Ultrac Vorti and the Nokian zLine summarizes real-world test results and draws a clear conclusion on which tyre performs better across the shared test pool. Both are summer tyres tested by major magazines; neither model is listed as replaced by a newer version.
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti — manufacturer: Vredestein
Nokian zLine — manufacturer: Nokian
Summary of test positions
- Automotorsport (11 tyres): Vredestein Ultrac Vorti — 11th (last); Nokian zLine — 6th.
- Auto Bild (9 tyres): Vredestein Ultrac Vorti — 3rd; Nokian zLine — 7th.
- ADAC (16 tyres): Vredestein Ultrac Vorti — 4th; Nokian zLine — 7th.
What the tests indicate
The Vredestein Ultrac Vorti shows strong peak performance: two solid top-4 finishes (Auto Bild and ADAC) and is explicitly noted for dry lane changing, a sign of sharp dry handling. However, its rank dropped to last in the Automotorsport test, which highlights a notable inconsistency — it can be excellent in several test criteria but may underperform under the specific conditions used by that outlet.
The Nokian zLine is more consistently mid‑pack: it placed 6th–7th across the three tests. That stability suggests predictable, balanced behaviour across a broad set of test conditions, but Nokian did not achieve the same high-end results as Vredestein in Auto Bild and ADAC.
Strengths and weaknesses
- Vredestein Ultrac Vorti — Strengths: Excellent dry handling (highlighted in tests), strong podium/top‑4 finishes in two major evaluations. Weaknesses: Sharp dip at Automotorsport (last place) points to inconsistency or a vulnerability under specific conditions used in that test.
- Nokian zLine — Strengths: Consistent mid‑range performance across all three tests, offering predictable behaviour for everyday driving. Weaknesses: Lacks the standout high rankings of Vredestein, so it may not deliver the same level of sporty dry performance.
Overall verdict — which tyre is better?
Looking across the three comparative tests, the Vredestein Ultrac Vorti comes out slightly ahead overall: it produced higher highs (two top‑4 results) while the Nokian zLine remained a steady but lower mid‑pack performer. If you prioritize sharp dry handling and the potential for top test scores, the Vredestein is the stronger pick. If you prefer consistent, predictable all‑round behaviour without surprises, the Nokian is the safer, more conservative choice.
In short: Vredestein = higher peak performance but some inconsistency; Nokian = steady, reliable middling performer. Follow the links above to inspect each tyre’s detailed test page and the manufacturers for specs and availability.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
2. Nokian zLine 20.
Average position in tests
2. Nokian zLine 7.384. Semperit Speed-Life 2 13.71
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Exemplary2. Nokian zLine Recommended3. Semperit Speed-Life 2 Satisfactory4. Yokohama Advan Sport V105 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Nokian zLine Recommended3. Semperit Speed-Life 2 Satisfactory4. Yokohama Advan Sport V105 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
3
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9,4 | 9,8 | 9,3 | 10 | |||
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti | 6,9 | 6,6 | 7,7 | 5,5 | |||
| Nokian zLine | 7,8 | 8,0 | 7,3 | 9,0 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | |||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2+ | |||||
| Nokian zLine Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Wear | Comfort | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,9 | 1,2 | 0,8 | 3,0 | 1,3 | ||
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Rating: Good | 2,5 | 1,3 | 2,3 | 3,1 | 2,5 | ||
| Nokian zLine Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 3,5 | 2,0 | ||
| Yokohama Advan Sport V105 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 1,2 | 1,5 | 3,5 | 2,7 | ||
| Semperit Speed-Life 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,0 | 2,5 | 1,8 | 3,4 | 1,6 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
