Segment
1. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Premium2. Nexen N fera Sport Lowcost
Comparison: Vredestein Ultrac Vorti vs. Nexen N fera Sport
Table of contents:
| # | Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
| Nexen N fera Sport
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R24 | R16 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
The ultimate showdown between Vredestein Ultrac Vorti and Nexen N fera Sport has been hotly anticipated by auto enthusiasts and industry experts alike. Both tyres are top of the line, summer-oriented models originating from reputable manufacturers Vredestein and Nexen respectively. Nevertheless, they offer varying performance capabilities and posess unique strengths and weaknesses worth noting.
The Vredestein Ultrac Vorti, made in Netherlands, didn't receive a rating from our testers; nonetheless, it performed well in the Autobild test, finishing 8th out of 50, and 7th out of 16 in the ADAC test. The tyre's strongest features notably included resistance to aquaplaning - cross, wet braking, wet handling and wet side guide, together with excellent mileage and minimum exterior noise as per the ADAC test. However, it is noteworthy that this model has been replaced, and you can find the newer model on our website.
On the other hand, the Nexen N fera Sport, made in the Czech Republic, scored a solid 67% rating in our tests. Being suited as the first equipment for BMW 2-series Active Tourer, it showcases its UHP (Ultra High Performance) subType. In the Autobild test, this tyre outdid the Vredestein, securing 7th position; improving even further in the ADAC test, where it claimed the 5th spot. It excelled in areas such as resistance to Aquaplaning - longitudal, wet braking and showed good mileage. Additionally, the Nexen N fera Sport has also been replaced by a newer model.
In summary, both tyres displayed merit in our tests, exhibiting particular strengths in mitigating aquaplaning and ensuring excellent wet braking. While the Nexen N fera Sport showed a slight edge in our comparative testing, the final choice boils down to specific requirements and individual preferences of the consumers.
The respective performances of these tyres indicate the dedication and drive behind Vredestein and Nexen in manufacturing products that speak volumes about safety and performance. No matter the choice, these tyres make an excellent choice for summer performance.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Exemplary2. Nexen N fera Sport Exemplary
Worst rating in test
2. Nexen N fera Sport Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 1- | 2 | ||||
| Nexen N fera Sport Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 1- | 2- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti | 33,4 | 31,3 | |||||
| Nexen N fera Sport | 33,2 | 30,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,7 | 1,3 | 2,8 | 2,0 | 1,6 | ||
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 2,5 | 2,9 | 2,0 | 2,4 | ||
| Nexen N fera Sport Rating: Satisfactory | 2,6 | 2,2 | 3,1 | 2,0 | 1,9 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
