18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Vredestein Quatrac vs. Firestone Multiseason 2 vs. Toyo Celsius AS2 vs. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Vredestein Quatrac /92%	Firestone Multiseason 2 /55%	Toyo Celsius AS2 /52%	GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 /79%

Dimensions	R15 - R20	R13 - R19	R15 - R20	R14 - R21
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

All-season tyre comparison: Vredestein Quatrac vs Firestone Multiseason 2 – two popular European-made options (HU and IT respectively) that frequently appear in independent tyre tests. Below we aggregate results from Autobild, ADAC and recent yearly summaries to help you choose the right set for your driving profile.

Models and availability: At the time of writing, neither model has been officially replaced by a newer generation. You can read more about the tyres here: Vredestein Quatrac and Firestone Multiseason 2. Manufacturer info: Vredestein and Firestone.

Test performance at a glance

Mutual test positions clearly favor the Quatrac overall:

Autobild (32 tyres): Quatrac 2/32 vs Multiseason 2 6/32 – strong win for Vredestein.

AUTOBILD (37 tyres): Quatrac 5/37 vs 22/37 – decisive advantage for Vredestein.

ADAC (16 tyres): Quatrac 6/16 vs 8/16 – Vredestein ahead again.

Across these large comparative tests, the Vredestein Quatrac consistently places higher, indicating a more balanced performance envelope in mixed conditions.

Strengths and weaknesses

Vredestein Quatrac

Wet mastery: Repeatedly praised for wet circle cornering, wet handling and wet braking; very good aquaplaning reserves noted in 2023 reports.

Dry confidence: Good dry braking and agile handling; pleasant, quiet exterior noise performance in Autobild’s larger test.

Snow capability: Rated “good” for overall snow performance, though some summaries mention only average snow braking.

Efficiency and wear: Mixed findings – low rolling resistance in 2022, but higher-than-average in 2024; mileage assessed as only average in several years.

Overall, the Quatrac combines class-leading wet safety with well-rounded dry and winter performance, making it a top pick for varied climates where rain performance is critical.

Firestone Multiseason 2

Snow specialist: Consistently strong snow traction and grip with short snow braking distances; very good around the wet handling lap.

Efficiency and value: Low rolling resistance and high mileage highlighted in multiple tests, plus a strong price/value proposition.

Trade-offs: Extended dry braking in 2024 and slightly below-average comfort; only moderate aquaplaning reserves and a tendency to understeer on snow and dry in some years. Mileage assessments vary by size/test (from high to somewhat limited).

In short, the Multiseason 2 leans toward winter traction and efficiency with a budget-friendly angle, but it does not match the Quatrac’s wet-braking safety or its consistently high overall rankings.

Verdict: which tyre is better overall?

If you prioritize maximum safety on wet roads and balanced performance year-round, the Vredestein Quatrac is the stronger performer across the board, reflected in its higher overall rating and superior placements in Autobild and ADAC. Choose it if rain performance and confident handling are your top concerns.
The Firestone Multiseason 2 is the smarter pick for drivers seeking excellent snow traction, lower rolling resistance and good value, and who can accept longer dry braking and some aquaplaning limitations. It’s a compelling, efficient choice in milder or snow-focused regions on a budget.

Segment

1. Vredestein Quatrac Premium

2. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 Premium

3. Firestone Multiseason 2 Upper-middle

4. Toyo Celsius AS2 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 182

2. Vredestein Quatrac 85

3. Toyo Celsius AS2 81

4. Firestone Multiseason 2 61

Number of tests

1. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 28x

2. Vredestein Quatrac 16x

3. Toyo Celsius AS2 14x

4. Firestone Multiseason 2 13x

Best position in test

1. Vredestein Quatrac 1.

2. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 1.

3. Firestone Multiseason 2 6.

4. Toyo Celsius AS2 7.

Worst position in test

1. Vredestein Quatrac 6.

2. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 12.

3. Toyo Celsius AS2 16.

4. Firestone Multiseason 2 22.

Average position in tests

1. Vredestein Quatrac 3.13

2. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 3.89

3. Firestone Multiseason 2 10.92

4. Toyo Celsius AS2 11.64

Year of the last test

1. Firestone Multiseason 2 2025

2. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 2025

3. Toyo Celsius AS2 2025

4. Vredestein Quatrac 2025

Best rating in test

1. Vredestein Quatrac Exemplary

2. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 Test winner

3. Firestone Multiseason 2 Good

4. Toyo Celsius AS2 Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Firestone Multiseason 2 Good

2. Vredestein Quatrac Recommended

3. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 Satisfactory

4. Toyo Celsius AS2 Conditionally recommended

Snow

(Overall rating)

GoodYear
Vector 4Seasons Gen-3

86%

Vredestein
Quatrac

75%

Firestone
Multiseason 2

73%

Toyo
Celsius AS2

67%

Snow handling

1. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 84%

2. Vredestein Quatrac 76%

3. Firestone Multiseason 2 71%

4. Toyo Celsius AS2 64%

Snow traction

1. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 89%

2. Firestone Multiseason 2 83%

3. Vredestein Quatrac 77%

4. Toyo Celsius AS2 60%

Snow braking

1. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 86%

2. Firestone Multiseason 2 83%

3. Vredestein Quatrac 81%

4. Toyo Celsius AS2 77%

Snow cornering

1. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 85%

2. Vredestein Quatrac 66%

3. Toyo Celsius AS2 66%

4. Firestone Multiseason 2 57%

Wet

(Overall rating)

Vredestein
Quatrac

85%

GoodYear
Vector 4Seasons Gen-3

84%

Firestone
Multiseason 2

66%

Toyo
Celsius AS2

65%

Wet handling

1. Vredestein Quatrac 92%

2. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 88%

3. Firestone Multiseason 2 74%

4. Toyo Celsius AS2 52%

Wet braking

1. Vredestein Quatrac 87%

2. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 79%

3. Firestone Multiseason 2 74%

4. Toyo Celsius AS2 51%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Vredestein Quatrac 81%

2. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 81%

3. Toyo Celsius AS2 78%

4. Firestone Multiseason 2 55%

Wet circle cornering

1. Vredestein Quatrac 90%

2. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 83%

3. Firestone Multiseason 2 74%

4. Toyo Celsius AS2 56%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Toyo Celsius AS2 90%

2. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 88%

3. Vredestein Quatrac 77%

4. Firestone Multiseason 2 54%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 B

2. Firestone Multiseason 2 B

3. Toyo Celsius AS2 ?

4. Vredestein Quatrac ?

Dry

(Overall rating)

Vredestein
Quatrac

78%

GoodYear
Vector 4Seasons Gen-3

77%

Toyo
Celsius AS2

67%

Firestone
Multiseason 2

66%

Dry braking

1. Vredestein Quatrac 76%

2. Toyo Celsius AS2 67%

3. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 67%

4. Firestone Multiseason 2 65%

Dry handling

1. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 87%

2. Vredestein Quatrac 81%

3. Toyo Celsius AS2 68%

4. Firestone Multiseason 2 66%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Vredestein
Quatrac

77%

GoodYear
Vector 4Seasons Gen-3

76%

Toyo
Celsius AS2

67%

Firestone
Multiseason 2

67%

Exterior noise

1. Vredestein Quatrac 77%

2. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 76%

3. Firestone Multiseason 2 73%

4. Toyo Celsius AS2 68%

Comfort

1. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 80%

2. Vredestein Quatrac 73%

3. Toyo Celsius AS2 73%

4. Firestone Multiseason 2 67%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Firestone Multiseason 2 71 dB

2. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 72 dB

3. Vredestein Quatrac ?

4. Toyo Celsius AS2 ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

GoodYear
Vector 4Seasons Gen-3

85%

Toyo
Celsius AS2

81%

Firestone
Multiseason 2

75%

Vredestein
Quatrac

61%

Rolling resistance

1. Firestone Multiseason 2 86%

2. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 82%

3. Toyo Celsius AS2 67%

4. Vredestein Quatrac 67%

Price/value

1. Toyo Celsius AS2 88%

2. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 81%

3. Firestone Multiseason 2 69%

4. Vredestein Quatrac 61%

Mileage

1. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 92%

2. Toyo Celsius AS2 88%

3. Firestone Multiseason 2 70%

4. Vredestein Quatrac 56%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 C

2. Firestone Multiseason 2 C

3. Toyo Celsius AS2 ?

4. Vredestein Quatrac ?

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 10 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild Allyear tyre test 2025 225/40 R18

Name	Stopping distance on dry	Stopping distance on wet
Best values in test	38.0	43.9
Vredestein Quatrac	40.3	43.9
Firestone Multiseason 2	41.5	50.3
Toyo Celsius AS2	40.4	51.0
Show test details

AUTOBILD Allyear tyre test 2024 225/50 R17

Name	Stopping distance on dry	Stopping distance on wet
Best values in test	36.8	50.5
Vredestein Quatrac	40.2	55.4
Firestone Multiseason 2	41.8	64.0
Toyo Celsius AS2	39.9	59.0
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3	41.5	55.2
Show test details

ADAC Allyear tyre test 2024 205/55 R16

Name	Points total	Enviromental impact	Driving safety
Best values in test	5.4	1.8	2.3
Vredestein Quatrac Rating: Good	2.8	2.2	3.1
Firestone Multiseason 2 Rating: Satisfactory	3.6	3.1	3.6
Toyo Celsius AS2 Rating: Satisfactory	3.8	2.3	3.8
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 Rating: Very good	2.4	1.8	2.7
Show test details

Tyre Reviews Allyear tyre test 2023 195/65 R15

Name
Vredestein Quatrac Rating: Recommended
Firestone Multiseason 2
Toyo Celsius AS2
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 Rating: Highly recommended
Show test details

Autobild Allyear tyre test 2023 225/45 R17

Name	Stopping distance on dry	Stopping distance on wet
Best values in test	37.7	45
Vredestein Quatrac	40.3	45.4
Firestone Multiseason 2	41.8	47.9
Toyo Celsius AS2	40.9	50.6
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3	41.8	48.3
Show test details

Autobild Allyear tyre test 2023 225/45 R17

Name
Vredestein Quatrac Rating: Exemplary
Firestone Multiseason 2 Rating: Satisfactory
Toyo Celsius AS2 Rating: Satisfactory
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 Rating: Good
Show test details

Autobild Allyear tyre test 2022 195/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on dry	Stopping distance on wet
Best values in test	39,9	44,4
Vredestein Quatrac	41,7	47,1
Firestone Multiseason 2	45,9	48,9
Toyo Celsius AS2	43,5	53,2
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3	43,9	46,8
Show test details

Autobild Allyear tyre test 2022 195/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	1-	2+	1-	1
Vredestein Quatrac Rating: Satisfactory	2+	2	2+	2-
Firestone Multiseason 2 Rating: Satisfactory	2	3+	2	2+
Toyo Celsius AS2 Rating: Satisfactory	3+	2-	2	1
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 Rating: Satisfactory	1-	2	1-	2+
Show test details

Autobild Allyear tyre test 2020 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	1	2+	1	1
Vredestein Quatrac Rating: Exemplary	1	1-	2	1
Firestone Multiseason 2 Rating: Good	2	2+	2+	1
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 Rating: Test winner	1-	2+	1-	1
Show test details

Autobild Allyear tyre test 2020 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on dry	Stopping distance on wet
Best values in test	39,7	45
Vredestein Quatrac	40,6	46,3
Firestone Multiseason 2	41,2	49,3
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3	41,6	47
Show test details

Comparison: Vredestein Quatrac vs. Firestone Multiseason 2 vs. Toyo Celsius AS2 vs. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3

Add to comparison

Test performance at a glance

Strengths and weaknesses

Verdict: which tyre is better overall?

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands