Segment
1. Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ Premium2. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Premium3. Michelin CrossClimate 2 Premium4. Toyo Celsius AS2 Upper-middle5. Firestone Multiseason 2 Upper-middle
Comparison: Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ vs. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs. Toyo Celsius AS2 vs. Firestone Multiseason 2 vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
5. Toyo Celsius AS2 11.64
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Exemplary2. Michelin CrossClimate 2 Test winner5. Toyo Celsius AS2 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
5. Toyo Celsius AS2 Conditionally recommended
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow handling
Snow traction
Snow braking
Snow cornering
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet handling
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Enviromental impact | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9.5 | 8.9 | 10.0 | 10.0 | |||
| Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ Rating: Good | 8.5 | 8.4 | 7.2 | 6.9 | |||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 Rating: Very good | 9.5 | 8.2 | 10.0 | 8.9 | |||
| Michelin CrossClimate 2 Rating: Good | 7.8 | 8.7 | 9.2 | 8.0 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
