Segment
1. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Upper-middle2. Viking WinTech Lowcost3. Giti Gitiwinter W2 Lowcost4. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo Lowcost5. Avon ZV7 Lowcost7. Laufenn i*Fit + LW31 Lowcost8. Nexen N blue HD Plus Lowcost
Comparison: Viking WinTech vs. Giti Gitiwinter W2 vs. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo vs. Avon ZV7 vs. Kleber Quadraxer 3 vs. GT Radial Champiro WinterPro 2 vs. Laufenn i*Fit + LW31 vs. Nexen N blue HD Plus
Number of sizes available
2. Avon ZV7 278
Number of tests
Best position in test
6. Avon ZV7 8.
Worst position in test
8. Avon ZV7 42.
Average position in tests
5. Giti Gitiwinter W2 13.776. Avon ZV7 18.557. Viking WinTech 20.83
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Highly recommended4. Viking WinTech Recommended5. Nexen N blue HD Plus Satisfactory6. Avon ZV7 Satisfactory7. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
3. Viking WinTech Conditionally recommended4. Avon ZV7 Sufficient5. GT Radial Winter Pro 2 evo Sufficient6. Giti Gitiwinter W2 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Winter | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1.7 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 1.7 | 2.7 | 1.6 | 1.3 |
| Viking WinTech Rating: Satisfactory | 2.8 | 2.8 | 3.6 | 3.1 | 4.3 | 3.0 | 2.2 |
| Giti GitiWinter W2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2.5 | 2.5 | 3.2 | 2.9 | 4.0 | 2.6 | 1.6 |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 31,4 | 29,2 | |||||
| Viking WinTech | 36,0 | 31,0 | |||||
| Giti Gitiwinter W2 | 37,9 | 31,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
